From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
To: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
chenzhongjin@huawei.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
broonie@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:16:53 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2207011609360.23331@pobox.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220524001637.1707472-20-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Hi,
sorry for the late reply...
On Mon, 23 May 2022, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
>
> - Create arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h and define
> klp_arch_set_pc() and klp_get_ftrace_location() which
> are required for livepatch.
>
> - Define TIF_PATCH_PENDING in arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> for livepatch.
>
> - Check TIF_PATCH_PENDING in do_notify_resume() to patch the
> current task for livepatch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 4 ++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..72d7cd86f158
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + *
> + * livepatch.h - arm64-specific Kernel Live Patching Core
> + */
> +#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_LIVEPATCH_H
> +#define _ASM_ARM64_LIVEPATCH_H
> +
> +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +
> +static inline void klp_arch_set_pc(struct ftrace_regs *fregs, unsigned long ip)
> +{
> + struct pt_regs *regs = ftrace_get_regs(fregs);
> +
> + regs->pc = ip;
> +}
kernel/livepatch/ does not use klp_arch_set_pc() anymore. It was replaced
by ftrace_instruction_pointer_set() and
CONFIG_HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS.
> +/*
> + * klp_get_ftrace_location is expected to return the address of the BL to the
> + * relevant ftrace handler in the callsite. The location of this can vary based
> + * on several compilation options.
> + * CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> + * - Inserts 2 nops on function entry the second of which is the BL
> + * referenced above. (See ftrace_init_nop() for the callsite sequence)
> + * (this is required by livepatch and must be selected)
> + * CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL:
> + * - Inserts a hint #0x22 on function entry if the function is called
> + * indirectly (to satisfy BTI requirements), which is inserted before
> + * the two nops from above.
> + */
> +#define klp_get_ftrace_location klp_get_ftrace_location
> +static inline unsigned long klp_get_ftrace_location(unsigned long faddr)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = faddr + AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL)
> + addr = ftrace_location_range(addr, addr + AARCH64_INSN_SIZE);
> +#endif
> +
> + return addr;
> +}
This is not needed either. peterz improved the ftrace code and livepatch
now uses ftrace_location() which gives the proper location directly.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index e1317b7c4525..a1d8999dbdcc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
> #define TIF_UPROBE 4 /* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */
> #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT 5 /* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */
> #define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL 6 /* signal notifications exist */
> +#define TIF_PATCH_PENDING 7 /* pending live patching update */
> #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE 8 /* syscall trace active */
> #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 9 /* syscall auditing */
> #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 10 /* syscall tracepoint for ftrace */
> @@ -98,11 +99,12 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
> #define _TIF_SVE (1 << TIF_SVE)
> #define _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT (1 << TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT)
> #define _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL (1 << TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
> +#define _TIF_PATCH_PENDING (1 << TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>
> #define _TIF_WORK_MASK (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
> _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE | \
> _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \
> - _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
> + _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
>
> #define _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \
> _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> index 4a4122ef6f39..cbec9597349f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/resume_user_mode.h>
> +#include <linux/livepatch.h>
> #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>
> @@ -938,6 +939,9 @@ void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long thread_flags)
> (void __user *)NULL, current);
> }
>
> + if (thread_flags & _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
> + klp_update_patch_state(current);
> +
> if (thread_flags & (_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
> do_signal(regs);
The rest should be fine.
Regards
Miroslav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-01 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <e81e773678f88f7c2ff7480e2eb096973ec198db>
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] objtool: Reorganize CFI code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] objtool: Reorganize instruction-related code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] objtool: Move decode_instructions() to a separate file madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] objtool: Reorganize Unwind hint code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC types madvenka
2022-05-24 14:27 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-29 15:36 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] objtool: Reorganize ORC kernel code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] objtool: arm64: Implement decoder for FP validation madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] objtool: arm64: Implement command to invoke the decoder madvenka
2022-05-24 14:09 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-29 14:49 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-30 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-01 22:45 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-07 18:13 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] objtool: arm64: Compute destinations for call and jump instructions madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] objtool: arm64: Walk instructions and compute CFI for each instruction madvenka
2022-05-24 13:45 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-29 15:18 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-30 1:44 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] objtool: arm64: Generate ORC data from CFI for object files madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] objtool: arm64: Dump ORC data present in " madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] objtool: arm64: Add unwind hint support madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] arm64: Add unwind hints to specific points in code madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] arm64: Add kernel and module support for ORC madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] arm64: Build the kernel with ORC information madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] arm64: unwinder: Add a reliability check in the unwinder based on ORC madvenka
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch madvenka
2022-07-01 14:16 ` Miroslav Benes [this message]
2022-07-01 19:53 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-05-24 0:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] arm64: Enable livepatch for ARM64 madvenka
2022-05-24 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: livepatch: Use ORC for dynamic frame pointer validation Chen Zhongjin
2022-05-29 15:30 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-15 12:18 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-06-15 13:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-15 14:18 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-06-15 20:50 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-06-15 20:47 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.21.2207011609360.23331@pobox.suse.cz \
--to=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenzhongjin@huawei.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).