From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:57:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:56:39 -0400 Received: from news.cistron.nl ([62.216.30.38]:56335 "EHLO ncc1701.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:56:24 -0400 From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" Subject: Re: UP IO-APIC Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 18:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Cistron Message-ID: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 X-Trace: ncc1701.cistron.net 1032890470 4302 62.216.29.67 (24 Sep 2002 18:01:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article , Ricky Beam wrote: >The local >APIC makes perfect sense albeit rare. Single processor IO APICs are very >rare and are usually MP systems with only one processor. I think most AMD Athlon boards have an IO APIC Mike. -- Computers are useless, they only give answers. --Pablo Picasso