From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753388AbeBLSXA (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:23:00 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:44810 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538AbeBLSW6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:22:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: juno: Describe the full GICv2m region To: Sudeep Holla , Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liviu Dudau Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Thomas Gleixner References: <20180207143255.17003-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20180207143255.17003-3-marc.zyngier@arm.com> From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:22:55 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/02/18 18:17, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 07/02/18 14:32, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> From: Robin Murphy >> >> Juno's GICv2m implementation consists of four frames providing 32 >> interrupts each. Since it is possible to plug in enough PCIe endpoints >> to consume more than 32 MSIs, and the driver already has a bodge to >> handle multiple frames, let's expose the other three as well. >> > > Change on it own looks good. So if you want to merge via your tree: > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla > > Let me know if you decide not to take it via your tree and you want me > to send it to arm-soc. > > On the side note I just noticed the Juno TRM[1] has 64k for each of > these MSI frames(page 3-24 section 3.3.5 Application memory map summary) > > I am not sure if TRM is wrong. This patch is just copying the 4k size > from frame 0 which got added with initial Juno DTS. Depends what your point of view is: The address map allocates 64KB worth of space for the device, but the device itself only decodes the first 4KB of that. My view is that the DT is describing the actual devices, not the interconnect routing between them, so there's really no need to tell consumers to map known-useless empty space. Robin.