From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030621AbXCLQhY (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:37:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030619AbXCLQhX (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:37:23 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]:29286 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030622AbXCLQhW (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:37:22 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fi9ixEeS4ExvFOTwN83ss8X9VdaRzEGKm6uR9blnlmD/5GRr/jIzxCw9/5Rpo4UCvubRSUgpgfrLQpvTzFifcCURlkrQTLxuBFkDp2NPYteo2xZR0oYvWSu2E49pfv3iYvtfHowkDlecxeSMPuUNNyOORJk0j74QBAoEyQEeaNo= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:37:19 -0400 From: "michael chang" To: "jos poortvliet" Subject: Re: [ck] Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, "Al Boldi" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200703121559.23157.jos@mijnkamer.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200703042335.26785.a1426z@gawab.com> <200703122352.51257.kernel@kolivas.org> <200703121714.25034.a1426z@gawab.com> <200703121559.23157.jos@mijnkamer.nl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/12/07, jos poortvliet wrote: > Op Monday 12 March 2007, schreef Al Boldi: > > > > It only takes one negatively nice'd proc to affect X adversely. > > goes faster than ever)? Or is this really the scheduler's fault? > Take this with a grain of salt, but, I don't think this is the scheduler's _fault_. That said, if the scheduler can fix it, it's not necessarily a bad thing. -- ~Mike - Just the crazy copy cat.