From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
bsegall@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: combine detach into dequeue when migrating task
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 20:32:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1addf39-d272-322b-ed4e-79328b51f5af@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220620133608.78498-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Hello, friendly ping...
Thanks.
On 2022/6/20 21:36, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> When we are migrating task out of the CPU, we can combine detach and
> propagation into dequeue_entity() to save the detach_entity_cfs_rq()
> -> propagate_entity_cfs_rq() call in detach_entity_cfs_rq() in
> migrate_task_rq_fair().
>
> This optimization is like combining DO_ATTACH in the enqueue_entity()
> when migrating task to the CPU.
>
> So we don't have to traverse the CFS tree extra time to do the
> detach_entity_cfs_rq() -> propagate_entity_cfs_rq() call, which
> wouldn't be called anymore with this patch's change.
>
> Copied from Dietmar's much clearer comment:
>
> detach_task()
> deactivate_task()
> dequeue_task_fair()
> for_each_sched_entity(se)
> dequeue_entity()
> update_load_avg() /* (1) */
>
> set_task_cpu()
> migrate_task_rq_fair()
> /* called detach_entity_cfs_rq() before the patch (2) */
>
> This patch save the propagate_entity_cfs_rq(&p->se) call from (2)
> by doing the detach_entity_load_avg(), update_tg_load_avg() for
> a migrating task inside (1) (the task being the first se in the loop)
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - change the commit message a little.
> - remove the forward declaration of detach_entity_cfs_rq()
> - remove verbose comments in code.
>
> v3:
> - change to use task_on_rq_migrating() and put Dietmar's much clearer
> description in the commit message. Thanks!
>
> v2:
> - fix !CONFIG_SMP build error
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 8bed75757e65..31d53c11e244 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3931,6 +3931,7 @@ static void detach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
> #define UPDATE_TG 0x1
> #define SKIP_AGE_LOAD 0x2
> #define DO_ATTACH 0x4
> +#define DO_DETACH 0x8
>
> /* Update task and its cfs_rq load average */
> static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> @@ -3948,7 +3949,14 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
> decayed = update_cfs_rq_load_avg(now, cfs_rq);
> decayed |= propagate_entity_load_avg(se);
>
> - if (!se->avg.last_update_time && (flags & DO_ATTACH)) {
> + if (flags & DO_DETACH) {
> + /*
> + * DO_DETACH means we're here from dequeue_entity()
> + * and we are migrating task out of the CPU.
> + */
> + detach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
> + update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
> + } else if (!se->avg.last_update_time && (flags & DO_ATTACH)) {
>
> /*
> * DO_ATTACH means we're here from enqueue_entity().
> @@ -4241,6 +4249,7 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_is_decayed(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> #define UPDATE_TG 0x0
> #define SKIP_AGE_LOAD 0x0
> #define DO_ATTACH 0x0
> +#define DO_DETACH 0x0
>
> static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int not_used1)
> {
> @@ -4460,6 +4469,11 @@ static __always_inline void return_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
> static void
> dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> {
> + int action = UPDATE_TG;
> +
> + if (entity_is_task(se) && task_on_rq_migrating(task_of(se)))
> + action |= DO_DETACH;
> +
> /*
> * Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
> */
> @@ -4473,7 +4487,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> * - For group entity, update its weight to reflect the new share
> * of its group cfs_rq.
> */
> - update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
> + update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, action);
> se_update_runnable(se);
>
> update_stats_dequeue_fair(cfs_rq, se, flags);
> @@ -6938,8 +6952,6 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flags)
> return new_cpu;
> }
>
> -static void detach_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se);
> -
> /*
> * Called immediately before a task is migrated to a new CPU; task_cpu(p) and
> * cfs_rq_of(p) references at time of call are still valid and identify the
> @@ -6973,15 +6985,7 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu)
> se->vruntime -= min_vruntime;
> }
>
> - if (p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING) {
> - /*
> - * In case of TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING we in fact hold the 'old'
> - * rq->lock and can modify state directly.
> - */
> - lockdep_assert_rq_held(task_rq(p));
> - detach_entity_cfs_rq(&p->se);
> -
> - } else {
> + if (!task_on_rq_migrating(p)) {
> /*
> * We are supposed to update the task to "current" time, then
> * its up to date and ready to go to new CPU/cfs_rq. But we
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-28 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-20 13:36 [PATCH v4] sched/fair: combine detach into dequeue when migrating task Chengming Zhou
2022-06-28 12:32 ` Chengming Zhou [this message]
2022-06-28 15:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2022-06-29 1:37 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1addf39-d272-322b-ed4e-79328b51f5af@bytedance.com \
--to=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).