From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7049EC4363C for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165112173E for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728198AbgJGSou (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:44:50 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0111.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.111]:37170 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727293AbgJGSot (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:44:49 -0400 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06281802915B; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:44:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: edge71_3e0bdaf271d1 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2066 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.133.149]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 18:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] checkpatch: add new warnings to author signoff checks. From: Joe Perches To: Dwaipayan Ray Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel , Lukas Bulwahn Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 11:44:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20201007063315.41585-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 00:08 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:48 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 12:08 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:03 PM Dwaipayan Ray wrote: > > > > The author signed-off-by checks are currently very vague. > > > > Cases like same name or same address are not handled separately. > > > > Likely now, the type should be changed from NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF > > to a single something else for all the other types of messages. > > > > > Since BAD_SIGNOFF is being used for a different context, then > probably BAD_AUTHOR_SIGNOFF. > > Should this work or anything else you have in mind? That may be a bit too strong a wording as these aren't significant/bad defects. Maybe something like FROM_SIGNOFF_MISMATCH. It's not anything that would reject the patch. It's a pity type uses both SIGNOFF and SIGN_OFF.