From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752103AbeD3IgX (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 04:36:23 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:47697 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751251AbeD3IgV (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 04:36:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] rpmsg: Guard against null endpoint ops in destroy To: Chris Lew , , , , , CC: , , , , , References: <1524783545-21951-1-git-send-email-clew@codeaurora.org> <1524783545-21951-5-git-send-email-clew@codeaurora.org> From: Arnaud Pouliquen Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:36:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1524783545-21951-5-git-send-email-clew@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.48] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG6NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.18) To SFHDAG3NODE1.st.com (10.75.127.7) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-30_03:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Chris, On 04/27/2018 12:59 AM, Chris Lew wrote: > In RPMSG GLINK the chrdev device will allocate an ept as part of the > rpdev creation. This device will not register endpoint ops even though > it has an allocated ept. Protect against the case where the device is > being destroyed. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Lew > --- > > Changes since v1: > - New change > > drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c > index 920a02f0462c..7bfe36afccc5 100644 > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ struct rpmsg_endpoint *rpmsg_create_ept(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, > */ > void rpmsg_destroy_ept(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept) > { > - if (ept) > + if (ept && ept->ops) > ept->ops->destroy_ept(ept); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_destroy_ept); > Would make sense that you also add test on ept->ops->destroy_ept. I guess that ops may not be null while destroy_ept pointer is. Regards Arnaud