From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:20:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:20:22 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:9488 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:20:21 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Unable to boot a raw kernel image :?? Date: 5 Mar 2003 16:30:18 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: References: <20021129132126.GA102@DervishD> <20030305161244.GB19439@DervishD> <3E662B2E.6080304@zytor.com> <1046912881.15971.29.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2003 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <1046912881.15971.29.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> By author: Alan Cox In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > It seems completely inappropriate to remove a feature from the 'stable' > kernel tree. > Agreed. The only issue is whether or not it's too broken to be considered a feature at this point (my feeling would be that it's not, and should be removed in 2.5, not 2.4.) -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64