From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964992AbWAXPfH (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:35:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964995AbWAXPfH (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:35:07 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.199]:42833 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964992AbWAXPfF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:35:05 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AKX2JyauGDasyUWrr6TiW+7wrl+wHzBRqqgHB0XaRKN4V92B27sP6e+iJDxVONapjiUBl5sta13LgoMwJcPqETUtJaxV6cjAcTB/AjlROXzzm7lt+8ZpIHC1TWSSqYU8FbfJGYMtZXskqCV3+HBOZO0Rb3wxpvjbG5SLRmOf0yI= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:35:04 -0500 From: Bob Copeland To: Johan Kullstam Subject: Re: Development tree, PLEASE? Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <8764odbfjb.fsf@sophia.axel.nom> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <1137785271.13530.10.camel@grayson> <20060120220440.GA22061@snarc.org> <8764odbfjb.fsf@sophia.axel.nom> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21 Jan 2006 13:29:44 -0500, Johan Kullstam wrote: > Why not just drop the "2"? It's not like the "2" is going anywhere > with current or even with the past development models. 2.X.Y has > already been used (for X = 0-6 and modest Y), so 6.16.1 could be used > instead of 2.6.16-rc1. Please no. Let's not follow Sun off of that particular version number cliff. Bob