From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E786C4727E for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382FD207C3 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="d713WqGD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730784AbgI3PUp (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:20:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40856 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729395AbgI3PUg (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:20:36 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com (mail-io1-xd43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18BF3C061755; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id z13so2191886iom.8; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:20:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CqHR3iMjvi/+BrsGXxXP4f66oyzEMJKnPL1FtLSH8L8=; b=d713WqGDCNpGjBvAOshn0SivS92z6rxcw8GKKckeY3VNOinC44xgP3uWRFu/+Xz+sy YvKgTk9LhXN6gbsUAnDE/rUFNfwsfMu4cmCa6xEjDI1k/cLU1/VnkcNP6gIDik19Z92y snHokw11f7ndkL8ALgMO+eqmOs9+9bk1FW5Nw6UZOdke5K6KNy99IQn1kiztsKvkRQAC U+/KHgr7bEt6ibWOe/jxKZY7DHpguxEHGngrFAvo1CGhHHtzCJp7QAVreX4oDspyABaD HAPm58H9wdqXC6JaeMNL1vYW6yILYMOF2Cq3d+fR1V0g0YzXoIwjMYMtk/UpYtYAH+Hc WjgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CqHR3iMjvi/+BrsGXxXP4f66oyzEMJKnPL1FtLSH8L8=; b=Ahiz61DjDHM0XwqrEErye4COYzUjhVaDT9lqs87xyHiNzdg843XPwTllljkF+ll+tg NRTBeClQC+wdkKxzI7Efq+pNICS4wvF+HNd8+V2GvkJuK3BsJMeFAhXt4iazYvjdVn7Y xJLmGaz8q332G0YMqExcdc383//PatmsWY+pJQvUPEI1tl+tDDAhVKeZGypLyo4nAErK bcYpvZ9OGLH4m6I3yBv6GMXf+GlcvZlY3TKZjWOiJ580ksEs1LWOccO3X3k0n9YJ3RVq a5zwAErkLKhAOy70xFSnn3nt2NxndCuPd0Wh9UEwHOcoTCNUaWf0db2CT4pUh9mGKmP6 S+Lg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532aMJzmOOQw1pDW+ekcXBTnN0vdu2csbexPnK5Gdse0wVTG4PJL QeLxwJ9sIszHFprgOSt4BOg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZB8L46jzftLd5djIuk3m9qq3lXlQEDaXsco/Ve7fJaCZ1l/d+c4jPWYiXOfyIhv74FtKxlg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:b149:: with SMTP id s9mr2430538jah.80.1601479235320; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ip-99-203-15-156.pools.cgn.spcsdns.net. [99.203.15.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t10sm770788iog.49.2020.09.30.08.20.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:20:34 -0700 (PDT) From: YiFei Zhu To: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: YiFei Zhu , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aleksa Sarai , Andrea Arcangeli , Andy Lutomirski , David Laight , Dimitrios Skarlatos , Giuseppe Scrivano , Hubertus Franke , Jack Chen , Jann Horn , Josep Torrellas , Kees Cook , Tianyin Xu , Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum , Tycho Andersen , Valentin Rothberg , Will Drewry Subject: [PATCH v3 seccomp 4/5] selftests/seccomp: Compare bitmap vs filter overhead Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:19:15 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kees Cook As part of the seccomp benchmarking, include the expectations with regard to the timing behavior of the constant action bitmaps, and report inconsistencies better. Example output with constant action bitmaps on x86: $ sudo ./seccomp_benchmark 100000000 Current BPF sysctl settings: net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1 net.core.bpf_jit_harden = 0 Benchmarking 200000000 syscalls... 129.359381409 - 0.008724424 = 129350656985 (129.4s) getpid native: 646 ns 264.385890006 - 129.360453229 = 135025436777 (135.0s) getpid RET_ALLOW 1 filter (bitmap): 675 ns 399.400511893 - 264.387045901 = 135013465992 (135.0s) getpid RET_ALLOW 2 filters (bitmap): 675 ns 545.872866260 - 399.401718327 = 146471147933 (146.5s) getpid RET_ALLOW 3 filters (full): 732 ns 696.337101319 - 545.874097681 = 150463003638 (150.5s) getpid RET_ALLOW 4 filters (full): 752 ns Estimated total seccomp overhead for 1 bitmapped filter: 29 ns Estimated total seccomp overhead for 2 bitmapped filters: 29 ns Estimated total seccomp overhead for 3 full filters: 86 ns Estimated total seccomp overhead for 4 full filters: 106 ns Estimated seccomp entry overhead: 29 ns Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead (last 2 diff): 20 ns Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead (filters / 4): 19 ns Expectations: native ≤ 1 bitmap (646 ≤ 675): ✔️ native ≤ 1 filter (646 ≤ 732): ✔️ per-filter (last 2 diff) ≈ per-filter (filters / 4) (20 ≈ 19): ✔️ 1 bitmapped ≈ 2 bitmapped (29 ≈ 29): ✔️ entry ≈ 1 bitmapped (29 ≈ 29): ✔️ entry ≈ 2 bitmapped (29 ≈ 29): ✔️ native + entry + (per filter * 4) ≈ 4 filters total (755 ≈ 752): ✔️ Signed-off-by: Kees Cook [YiFei: Changed commit message to show stats for this patch series] Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu --- .../selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 151 +++++++++++++++--- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings | 2 +- 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c index 91f5a89cadac..fcc806585266 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c @@ -4,12 +4,16 @@ */ #define _GNU_SOURCE #include +#include +#include +#include #include #include #include #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -70,18 +74,74 @@ unsigned long long calibrate(void) return samples * seconds; } +bool approx(int i_one, int i_two) +{ + double one = i_one, one_bump = one * 0.01; + double two = i_two, two_bump = two * 0.01; + + one_bump = one + MAX(one_bump, 2.0); + two_bump = two + MAX(two_bump, 2.0); + + /* Equal to, or within 1% or 2 digits */ + if (one == two || + (one > two && one <= two_bump) || + (two > one && two <= one_bump)) + return true; + return false; +} + +bool le(int i_one, int i_two) +{ + if (i_one <= i_two) + return true; + return false; +} + +long compare(const char *name_one, const char *name_eval, const char *name_two, + unsigned long long one, bool (*eval)(int, int), unsigned long long two) +{ + bool good; + + printf("\t%s %s %s (%lld %s %lld): ", name_one, name_eval, name_two, + (long long)one, name_eval, (long long)two); + if (one > INT_MAX) { + printf("Miscalculation! Measurement went negative: %lld\n", (long long)one); + return 1; + } + if (two > INT_MAX) { + printf("Miscalculation! Measurement went negative: %lld\n", (long long)two); + return 1; + } + + good = eval(one, two); + printf("%s\n", good ? "✔️" : "❌"); + + return good ? 0 : 1; +} + int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { + struct sock_filter bitmap_filter[] = { + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS, offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)), + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), + }; + struct sock_fprog bitmap_prog = { + .len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(bitmap_filter), + .filter = bitmap_filter, + }; struct sock_filter filter[] = { + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS, offsetof(struct seccomp_data, args[0])), BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), }; struct sock_fprog prog = { .len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter), .filter = filter, }; - long ret; - unsigned long long samples; - unsigned long long native, filter1, filter2; + + long ret, bits; + unsigned long long samples, calc; + unsigned long long native, filter1, filter2, bitmap1, bitmap2; + unsigned long long entry, per_filter1, per_filter2; printf("Current BPF sysctl settings:\n"); system("sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable"); @@ -101,35 +161,82 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0); assert(ret == 0); - /* One filter */ - ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &prog); + /* One filter resulting in a bitmap */ + ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &bitmap_prog); assert(ret == 0); - filter1 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; - printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 1 filter: %llu ns\n", filter1); + bitmap1 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; + printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 1 filter (bitmap): %llu ns\n", bitmap1); + + /* Second filter resulting in a bitmap */ + ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &bitmap_prog); + assert(ret == 0); - if (filter1 == native) - printf("No overhead measured!? Try running again with more samples.\n"); + bitmap2 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; + printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 2 filters (bitmap): %llu ns\n", bitmap2); - /* Two filters */ + /* Third filter, can no longer be converted to bitmap */ ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &prog); assert(ret == 0); - filter2 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; - printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 2 filters: %llu ns\n", filter2); - - /* Calculations */ - printf("Estimated total seccomp overhead for 1 filter: %llu ns\n", - filter1 - native); + filter1 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; + printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 3 filters (full): %llu ns\n", filter1); - printf("Estimated total seccomp overhead for 2 filters: %llu ns\n", - filter2 - native); + /* Fourth filter, can not be converted to bitmap because of filter 3 */ + ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &bitmap_prog); + assert(ret == 0); - printf("Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead: %llu ns\n", - filter2 - filter1); + filter2 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; + printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 4 filters (full): %llu ns\n", filter2); + + /* Estimations */ +#define ESTIMATE(fmt, var, what) do { \ + var = (what); \ + printf("Estimated " fmt ": %llu ns\n", var); \ + if (var > INT_MAX) \ + goto more_samples; \ + } while (0) + + ESTIMATE("total seccomp overhead for 1 bitmapped filter", calc, + bitmap1 - native); + ESTIMATE("total seccomp overhead for 2 bitmapped filters", calc, + bitmap2 - native); + ESTIMATE("total seccomp overhead for 3 full filters", calc, + filter1 - native); + ESTIMATE("total seccomp overhead for 4 full filters", calc, + filter2 - native); + ESTIMATE("seccomp entry overhead", entry, + bitmap1 - native - (bitmap2 - bitmap1)); + ESTIMATE("seccomp per-filter overhead (last 2 diff)", per_filter1, + filter2 - filter1); + ESTIMATE("seccomp per-filter overhead (filters / 4)", per_filter2, + (filter2 - native - entry) / 4); + + printf("Expectations:\n"); + ret |= compare("native", "≤", "1 bitmap", native, le, bitmap1); + bits = compare("native", "≤", "1 filter", native, le, filter1); + if (bits) + goto more_samples; + + ret |= compare("per-filter (last 2 diff)", "≈", "per-filter (filters / 4)", + per_filter1, approx, per_filter2); + + bits = compare("1 bitmapped", "≈", "2 bitmapped", + bitmap1 - native, approx, bitmap2 - native); + if (bits) { + printf("Skipping constant action bitmap expectations: they appear unsupported.\n"); + goto out; + } - printf("Estimated seccomp entry overhead: %llu ns\n", - filter1 - native - (filter2 - filter1)); + ret |= compare("entry", "≈", "1 bitmapped", entry, approx, bitmap1 - native); + ret |= compare("entry", "≈", "2 bitmapped", entry, approx, bitmap2 - native); + ret |= compare("native + entry + (per filter * 4)", "≈", "4 filters total", + entry + (per_filter1 * 4) + native, approx, filter2); + if (ret == 0) + goto out; +more_samples: + printf("Saw unexpected benchmark result. Try running again with more samples?\n"); +out: return 0; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings index ba4d85f74cd6..6091b45d226b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings @@ -1 +1 @@ -timeout=90 +timeout=120 -- 2.28.0