From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF20C433F5 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 19:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356711AbhKYT72 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:59:28 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46876 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233721AbhKYT51 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:57:27 -0500 Received: from mail-oo1-xc35.google.com (mail-oo1-xc35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c35]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E8BBC06173E; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 11:54:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oo1-xc35.google.com with SMTP id p2-20020a4adfc2000000b002c2676904fdso2375579ood.13; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 11:54:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3PNODSeJUKSzpmtT5055Fa1wEv5yYWyy+5/m09p+AeA=; b=CJbw4Jm+zQe1XFivkZRUmGif9lxaxPHpk++ZyOHrbOq68cgGs3RMcCTBBUUopTP0lL h4Bv060+/KUTm8z6qxP4E4OnYDAFQke/ekjYTXsTDeqm3uOqXGI7Al2ZUjZzO/oNKoLT P8OTwXpUheF7i05BkCiocW/EjaSGUWvT8ES+RuwptqpIJKLSJwUo5udftfMTX+1Fzlpq 7nib55zW4TyOk3ZOyBGwTIQQmZFcG3NHCkAfDL6SlpQAWGjLXI5ErqdAFW5IwOgs+JHy WAXW9u9axuhiFZwqFM6IjtC25Vn0flc0H66ugiTAZGNzs623IfHjm50+rTbjHZovjeo6 zNuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3PNODSeJUKSzpmtT5055Fa1wEv5yYWyy+5/m09p+AeA=; b=lK59vhA7ovVGlDadHgF4CCDkAaSNaXzVHe7Jr+8zhXbo/MBz6PVHUQRy5xYLGr/j7+ 2oIDnVduxS6MQ8s4gBHRRMyNKJvVkVPQ8gYIB1NrI/tBMVNy7lrLBuAo6pFEQLPJk8nw dd8IAwDaJe1dUS7hu16a+uJ88Gn85FwlioQf2BtRttlLgvRGBH0u9R934a0hnrzQDzBg zi2oR7hUMT3iykpXb95Olh7Wm4TL5vDswFndDTf2tNzsIT/7yXdUZtyoOIDin7AeL9T9 xa/XggdniaphwXB18nYjb4fY3wVHUf7kyLKbf3XZ9qDR+Bj3oeRI3MwOJi1yGwv4/fRy bcOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qacDd5fLu/F2Udy5dzHY+kjaJZAo74uoPkTzjekKjvkeogh73 dU/sBJCt78SJ481Kzrp1SvVGFU82Tdo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7P+v+iwY3NcbdX5futs8CugPGAXHBFXD0FmRBAeTr/ZRkF8sr+O8Sv2WuGGV3xHCV6hVH4A== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:dc1a:: with SMTP id p26mr16327693oov.6.1637870054823; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 11:54:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m12sm657896ots.59.2021.11.25.11.54.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 11:54:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] hwmon: (nct6775) Implement custom lock by ACPI mutex. To: Eugene Shalygin , Andy Shevchenko Cc: Denis Pauk , Platform Driver , thomas@weissschuh.net, Jean Delvare , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20211122212850.321542-1-pauk.denis@gmail.com> <20211122212850.321542-3-pauk.denis@gmail.com> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 11:54:11 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/25/21 6:00 AM, Eugene Shalygin wrote: >> Please, do not top post in the mailing lists! > > Well, it was almost a new topic... > >> I'm not sure I have got the above correctly, do you mean that the just >> submitted asus_wmi_sensors HWMON driver will be replaced by your >> changes? If so, you guys, need a lot to improve communication between >> each other before submitting anything upstream. > > Yes, you get it right. Sorry for that, it was a long story and I > worked on the subject > only occasionally, so that when Denis took the code and submitted it > to the mainline > I was not sure which approach is better, and so I did not stop him. > We won't be heving two drivers with the same functionality. Give me one reason why I should not drop the wmi driver (or both of them; I am not sure which one we are talking about here). On top of all that, this submission isn't about any of the wmi drivers, but for the nct6775 driver, which just adds to the confusion. Guenter