From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F51413AA20; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709038435; cv=none; b=QeHOzdM6k8P1Q1vDQ74wYfySuxhcViOxFup1GrynS+6L7ilTSFPX86isMyWAMy7B2PU1T5ZB+DUyr6sLlsVq3wK/d1yOTk59ft+56m2taNiMsuLKwGRMFv/6vxEG6KiQ40hQwswTSga056a0fRT/tb5+Ri5fXzA+/hW342kRUVk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709038435; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9fNjD41K3hBKyAANYYkPJsBtf97N81Pzxj9XAun8H0c=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AH+8r23DdoW2D8RsTnhRaqjE7mwiPnyg23g4fxuifgOmraRxPsQmVBnTkjy6kzW7+oeAyxahYf0v/L8SQpn7Eia6x75D/rnX7dniOXpT+ncmgGluaQ6ZDpOy2Af6o6fNivykcNlrG01BrUnNmx/CmKLeRy4eOahzE1LofV82cHE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NJdNs6LS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NJdNs6LS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709038434; x=1740574434; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=9fNjD41K3hBKyAANYYkPJsBtf97N81Pzxj9XAun8H0c=; b=NJdNs6LSyxdrGtfVAqw+kGNs/cF4528uxnUxY4CnzCZyG9mEcRmZD8wq zKR8gOb/bwnaf5p/Swi0hyDWySd3+G3IYcvCaflwYcTHop+ema3Eh2rDf 1btxf7P6w1j1AMKvZ7dg2nuAPZjbk/YF78+Av5fUGHKCneudJkxcrjQrb EYDEqNBzGtmzxtH4EFA/cU2cr5HKMhF+aWG9nauneluQ/ophXmpLiSIAU 7gUOLfxTeQquGutfHwZYrwyxsZgQDXuRMi0PhcQUGyuxPyPpHDY3btHXj HEoEcEYw6v1lphxFN7D3zk49fUKxi5uoJMHW2atuF+W6ZWGy7m85yYePx g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10996"; a="6323974" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,187,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="6323974" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2024 04:53:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,187,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="11801003" Received: from ijarvine-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.246.34.61]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Feb 2024 04:53:51 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:53:47 +0200 (EET) To: Szilard Fabian cc: LKML , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, jwoithe@just42.net, Hans de Goede , W_Armin@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge control support In-Reply-To: <20240227120435.429687-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> Message-ID: References: <20240129163502.161409-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240129175714.164326-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240207023031.56805-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240215203012.228758-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240227120435.429687-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Szilard Fabian wrote: > This patch adds battery charge control support on Fujitsu notebooks > via the S006 method of the FUJ02E3 ACPI device. With this method it's > possible to set charge_control_end_threshold between 50 and 100%. > > Tested on Lifebook E5411 and Lifebook U728. Sadly I can't test this > patch on a dual battery one, but I didn't find any clue about > independent battery charge control on dual battery Fujitsu notebooks > either. And by that I mean checking the DSDT table of various Lifebook > notebooks and reverse engineering FUJ02E3.dll. > > Signed-off-by: Szilard Fabian > --- > v5: > * add ACPI_BATTERY dependency into Kconfig Thanks. My intention was that you'd send a new patch on top of what is already applied. But it doesn't matter anymore, I took the relevant line out of it and squashed it into the original commit. -- i.