From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262623AbTDUWvI (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:51:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262642AbTDUWvI (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:51:08 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:50953 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262623AbTDUWvI (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:51:08 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] new system call mknod64 Date: 21 Apr 2003 16:02:47 -0700 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2003 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: By author: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > and in fact the patches I have been giving out use kdev_t > as internal format, where you can think of kdev_t as > u64, or, if you prefer, as struct { u32 major, minor; }. > Any reason why we don't just *make it* a struct? (Well, besides that it'd somewhat suck on 64-bit architectures?) -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64