From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C3BC47082 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327A46127A for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232952AbhFHROD (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:14:03 -0400 Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]:10019 "EHLO m43-7.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231955AbhFHROC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:14:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1623172329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=CIKLmkMnvwyP5IOM9d74QsZFNlusl5GyO4NIbwNDzag=; b=EYOvaeQxZco5iVrgGtPM3Z33mvvTL30kO3Xm1AYTj51aamD0wbt2yn/FNNtD354o6dV8chxN eZLQBjxYaKTOgAe38+sOflzt7SOGwsaLOdlq27y9nEki1JhUaItg8523IWUa1My2CSBjjvAC Ja6YXQzagO8qWo7DGs4FYD6jt5c= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.7 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n04.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 60bfa4e4e27c0cc77f8d7889 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 08 Jun 2021 17:12:04 GMT Sender: faiyazm=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6844FC43148; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.105] (unknown [49.204.182.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: faiyazm) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9679FC4338A; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:11:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 9679FC4338A Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=faiyazm@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] mm: slub: move sysfs slab alloc/free interfaces to debugfs To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg KH , glittao@gmail.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org References: <1623141934-7699-1-git-send-email-faiyazm@codeaurora.org> From: Faiyaz Mohammed Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 22:41:54 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/8/2021 5:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 11:45 AM Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: >> >> alloc_calls and free_calls implementation in sysfs have two issues, >> one is PAGE_SIZE limitation of sysfs and other is it does not adhere >> to "one value per file" rule. >> >> To overcome this issues, move the alloc_calls and free_calls >> implementation to debugfs. >> >> Debugfs cache will be created if SLAB_STORE_USER flag is set. >> >> Rename the alloc_calls/free_calls to alloc_traces/free_traces, >> to be inline with what it does. >> >> Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed >> --- > > It seems you missed the version bump along with changelog. > Note, some maintainers (actually quite many I think) are using tools > to fetch up the patches and two patches with the same version is a > problem. Hence I do not consider it a nit-pick. > Hmmm, I think to avoid same version problem I have to push same patch with new version number and thank you for your patience. Thanks and regards, Mohammed Faiyaz