From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Fix use-after-free in cm4000_fops
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 08:53:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9d36537-bc94-71e5-a967-cd4cec50baf2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5b39544-a4fb-4796-a046-0b9be9853787@app.fastmail.com>
On 21. 02. 23, 13:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2023, at 07:51, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Ping -- what's the status of these?
>>
>> Should we mark cm4000_cs, cm4040_cs, and scr24x_cs as BROKEN instead?
>
> A few bug fixes ago, I think we had all agreed that the drivers can
> just be removed immediately, without a grace period or going through
> drivers/staging [1]. We just need someone to send the corresponding
> patches.
>
> While looking for those, I see that Dominik also asked the
> broader question about PCMCIA drivers in general [2] (sorry
> I missed that thread at the time), and Linus just merged my
> boardfile removal patches that ended up dropping half of the
> (arm32) soc or board specific socket back end drivers.
>
> Among the options that Dominik proposed in that email, I would
> prefer we go ahead with b) and remove most of the drivers that
> have no known users. I think we can be more aggressive though,
> as most of the drivers that are listed as 'some activity in
> 2020/21/22' seem to only be done to fix the same issues that
> were found in ISA or PCI drivers.
So let me start with removal of all (both + and -) listed[2]
drivers/char/pcmcia/ drivers. That includes all three racy/buggy ones.
And let's see what happens.
Personal not: this will also remove synclinc_cs \o/. Mostly only we, the
tty people, were forced to touch the driver and I really hate it.
> [2]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y07d7rMvd5++85BJ@owl.dominikbrodowski.net/
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-22 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-19 4:07 [PATCH v3] char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Fix use-after-free in cm4000_fops Hyunwoo Kim
2023-02-21 6:51 ` Jiri Slaby
2023-02-21 12:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-22 7:53 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2023-02-22 8:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9d36537-bc94-71e5-a967-cd4cec50baf2@kernel.org \
--to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).