From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AAEC49ED9 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3760E21670 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436982AbfIJQ5d (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:57:33 -0400 Received: from mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com ([148.163.147.86]:29760 "EHLO mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2436883AbfIJQ5d (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 12:57:33 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0150242.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x8AGv3OH030750; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:57:11 GMT Received: from g9t5009.houston.hpe.com (g9t5009.houston.hpe.com [15.241.48.73]) by mx0a-002e3701.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ux7qqq4vu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:57:11 +0000 Received: from g9t2301.houston.hpecorp.net (g9t2301.houston.hpecorp.net [16.220.97.129]) by g9t5009.houston.hpe.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA1258; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [16.116.129.27] (unknown [16.116.129.27]) by g9t2301.houston.hpecorp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC924D; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Dimitri Sivanich , Russ Anderson , Hedi Berriche , Steve Wahl , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , linux-kernel , stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20190905130252.590161292@stormcage.eag.rdlabs.hpecorp.net> <797654d8-562a-6492-79e1-65a292157d04@hpe.com> <20190910164050.GH23931@zn.tnic> From: Mike Travis Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:57:39 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190910164050.GH23931@zn.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPE-SCL: -1 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.70,1.0.8 definitions=2019-09-10_11:2019-09-10,2019-09-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1906280000 definitions=main-1909100162 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/10/2019 9:40 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 08:34:44AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote: >> Hi, I'm not conscientiously adding any attachments. I think what is >> happening is some email readers mistake the '---' to signify an attachment >> follows. I see the "staple" symbol on some indicating an attachment, but >> not usually all of the email I send. Thanks, Mike > > Btw, is there anyway to fix your mail setup and not flood with your > patchset? > > I have received your V2 patchset 5(!) times yesterday and today. All > separate submissions! > > ;-( > Sorry, I've been testing them and monitoring LKML to check for leakages. I certainly did not intend for any of those test sends to get out. And I don't understand right now how they did. I am using sendmail in it's basic form and you or anyone else was not on the recipient list. (Honestly, if I had known they got out, I would have stopped testing... :) But the latest ones are obviously the "official" submissions, since those are the copies that I also have.) If you accept them upstream, I'll quit sending them, I promise... :)