From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615EAC04E69 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231591AbjHNSeM (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 14:34:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35326 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231553AbjHNSdp (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 14:33:45 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0A4FF0; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7910620f45dso181154139f.1; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:33:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692038024; x=1692642824; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=hA1c32nPoqRtqKf1PeXAkYTakp7BkAfWNw6eIzfC7MU=; b=SoApQCrCfC7Mt89LgZDoWi1W1VWVv/sBUPllr/NAiHmv7RJREjec9tUvnmqf2ONb8f FTuhY+ZCQCL8UYzmbahUniwGqy9YqArSKiJl8bhPxu20rR5ny+2QKQ5SoRW3QM0ZWblX Jgxkc7ANJnqnsJBhyhBZJxtdDsXjTKcAgST/bKI1YIV4/o5gwyC6qEL6Y5eTcVvr27ma bgu1Yv2E8bVcwsGCvhWYVmx32odVL8jGMF+lYn0OyyJnr4K62jV4/JXnO+0AKuJFWmoQ y4JPrFchLR/ie2g+dJKkBXb1lZBuQhW1Wb8oR4zBD9tIjVumkKegnj620ntCo7XeKWwN rCaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692038024; x=1692642824; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hA1c32nPoqRtqKf1PeXAkYTakp7BkAfWNw6eIzfC7MU=; b=UZ9D0Fb5GEgrtnayisqCecHDG7qGRXQbGbCQYBgsOSv7VFno34wCsAoAcYKwZIRYyS bCDmTvsopWC5IJq8fjQfcZXPmb0fviffspKPy3RvYoJ9XhuRXiJJv23sr/ur6RnXOtl8 D90F7t1eB9/WKiUSKXCTntGa7XFu4C8YW9EiXah2gmC4fZdDaim5BKTMThmXJPW0Eir6 u1+a1lViMHQpROuOtQ8UBNTgmZqMpxKuVq9Y/HgqOo3x57kAJ5j3UKYL1pyfgV9zUBVi mxLZHyAyC4Jxrh/pFWLFo1eBS03zXxeKBEikE153VKChY0N/nP/cAV4Ym1009otmcMAH am2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxKi0BTgI147LNVc17fv49R2g4/U+8eDjGYCZAYPHxSeQus0fOd dvAMCgsTtRFlz7EeNAw/xNI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGInvIBfbQ8LylVFc5S+ya7eq8omF2ey3IsarSvH5b8Avvbz5J1tuP4Xh+uIsPEnn4nNDa1mg== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:4a17:0:b0:790:aedd:3e81 with SMTP id w23-20020a6b4a17000000b00790aedd3e81mr12348202iob.8.1692038024176; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2-20020a02c042000000b004310d570d6dsm3193100jam.94.2023.08.14.11.33.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:33:42 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/149] 6.1.46-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230813211718.757428827@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230813211718.757428827@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.46 release. > There are 149 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Tue, 15 Aug 2023 21:16:53 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 521 pass: 519 fail: 2 Failed tests: arm:fuji-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd128,0,8,1:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-fuji:rootfs arm:bletchley-bmc,fmc-model=mt25qu02g,spi-model=mt25qu02g:aspeed_g5_defconfig:notests:mem1G:mtd256:net,nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-bletchley:rootfs As already reported, the failing tests are crashing in f2fs code. This bears the questions 1) should I stop testing f2fs and 2), would it make sense to mark f2fs as broken in v6.1.y ? It doesn't seem to make sense to keep testing code which is known to be broken. Thanks, Guenter