From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932656AbcKVMnj (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:43:39 -0500 Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.31]:41088 "EHLO lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932480AbcKVMnh (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:43:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder To: Rick Chang References: <1479353915-5043-1-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479353915-5043-4-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479784905.8964.15.camel@mtksdaap41> Cc: Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Minghsiu Tsai From: Hans Verkuil Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:43:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1479784905.8964.15.camel@mtksdaap41> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/11/16 04:21, Rick Chang wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On 17/11/16 04:38, Rick Chang wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Rick Chang >>> Signed-off-by: Minghsiu Tsai >>> --- >>> This patch depends on: >>> CCF "Add clock support for Mediatek MT2701"[1] >>> iommu and smi "Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701"[2] >>> >>> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-October/007271.html >>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9164013/ >> >> I assume that 1 & 2 will appear in 4.10? So this patch needs to go in >> after the >> other two are merged in 4.10? >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans > > [1] will appear in 4.10, but [2] will appear latter than 4.10.So this > patch needs to go in after [1] & [2] will be merged in 4.11. So what should I do? Merge the driver for 4.11 and wait with this patch until [2] is merged in 4.11? Does that sound reasonable? Regards, Hans