From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752615AbdK1Oed (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:34:33 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:65404 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751889AbdK1Oeb (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:34:31 -0500 Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations To: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Cc: Arvind Yadav , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Sakamoto , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML References: <24f8c777-1eb4-e7e7-9371-79f32700c9dc@users.sourceforge.net> <2cbef557-5f89-c630-e108-14ef2ce6b41a@users.sourceforge.net> <1547a4c2-5b70-e3a3-b482-d28c538e615c@users.sourceforge.net> <539adde3-a713-721f-2a0d-1d1ef925fb86@users.sourceforge.net> <9a9348f4-d059-de28-1445-0189b7fb0ba3@users.sourceforge.net> <3b7b24bd-4bdf-752e-1a62-cc71e9152acc@users.sourceforge.net> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:33:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Vm5Bv6sZCBjE3s3pmMbiDvrnB8JDgpvAUZnP8iKA1hH6+s1Y9u1 G2gZ+54GUpJOJyxcKc3KjP0RX/uLCEEVQLBmhjgfjiT90STy3gkhQjcnvMJ7cz7O2RqKeAQ TzOTeMSb8y1+hmU3KXFo3KMroCZCzUcSB3o96w6FKa0iwT4qi27v4r+8NWua6+ycN+/xfnV NVddo+xYBpe2h28VK10Dg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:AOiygSq9Mds=:0iGNJ9Ye3i99LyS/zOUi+9 Wh1mIR/6LWm/0JekPJDvkwnEbIfFvTUwWNAR16WKFHkIc5q2qPMEqBIOTJA7I/fkmOZ54FFpp NUXB/ATc31AuxP8pauQckeFwm1FUD+4Ds58YnLQPMAcVz8vi++AoDEDI4RKHroRVnVVLhltw0 WDsax8Hkbzz3P80VZ7h9GnLTYTfBBLEN0Ayn0raVJtWxP0MI/tignIAn+61zlHhwVg4YldMzt 3XxbSsMuR5jW457VKOGqtvWfWsT/qfPJF7SdD1Y7sReCwHk1IYSVn4efX3nLL8MHueJj4xzEh VA+us2l77G149uuzbChRQdXvm7ILRMLh5ODLIk6Ra4yatkv2GAOJ3F/+6sAxmUjNS907bsZ+i HQNtBzn9e8uURb+MHJ2Hq8XwWQk4CQY9uKMotZsml67q52d4zLk/z1MkPKUDw87fjiQNh1GBL LmhFE4ZplB2k69ADXMjF7Z5UEuEIpourJjG9xcZilYjqVR1IBYqkLf40DFcZoO17TkVfEiVOs ZysC6kG4+JX9LBMrRIp6OL0I0Z8L8JSz8TxEtiYrLbd7Wq3dvtvktF/k9SS7fzwaBM2FDuqcP i8HNkMtJH3kXYnlM+tOz62GkIeO137d3yja5IjRT8swL50XS21Uw9PPMr6qwdyZIgNLN7zwog 7AYPwefbiC0FmNZtbAxPuJi5aCRHWz9hXauf39NsTTtibrpLui+ENxpR5DseYyULEQ89iPHm3 VV+QRapFkchBlIDdrKF403SWGo/XK1Heilq7ysr0KJ+rd3/Rkvz2WRQH7sJWBGAuh5LXv3S06 DnT6etwyam/n61O2uzJGw6c04ejod6yVSZxFz+8mTfCqcPMe3A= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If *you* do introduce automatic testing for *your* patches, > then I appreciate it. How would such a setting influence my trust level for your subsystem maintenance? > I can trust my system for my purpose. I need to trust it also somehow. Regards, Markus