From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752051AbcKGGq4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:46:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:33526 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751226AbcKGGqy (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:46:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/22] Add Mediated device support To: Kirti Wankhede , alex.williamson@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, cjia@nvidia.com References: <1478293856-8191-1-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com> <40bfdbe9-1070-b5e6-fba2-6b97999b558b@nvidia.com> <4effe29e-98ef-cacd-75fa-35d4e7ed6457@nvidia.com> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, jike.song@intel.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alexey Kardashevskiy Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:46:46 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4effe29e-98ef-cacd-75fa-35d4e7ed6457@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/11/16 17:36, Kirti Wankhede wrote: > > > On 11/7/2016 11:45 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 07/11/16 14:59, Kirti Wankhede wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/7/2016 9:00 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>> On 05/11/16 08:10, Kirti Wankhede wrote: > > ... > >>>>> >>>>> Patch series tested with linux-next upto commit 14970f204b19 @Fri Oct 28 >>>>> Resolved against conflicting change: >>>> >>>> Patch 11/22 does not apply if the patchset is applied on top of 14970f204b19. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Pull commit 05692d7005a3 (below) commit. >> >> Nah, it was my fault, thunderbird's plugin saved mails in wrong order, >> false alarm, sorry. >> >> Speaking of order, 11/22 is better be squashed into 02/22 (as it does not >> seem to make sense alone; it also does not depend on something between >> 02/22 and 11/22); and both 01/22 and 02/22 better be moved where "docs" >> patches start as they do not makes sense earlier anyway, or do they? >> >> > > There are dependencies in the patch series: > Patch 10/22 depends on patch 01/22 and patch 03/22 to 09/22 patch. > > Patch 02/22 depends on patch 01/22. > > Patch 11/22 doesn't make sense without patch 10/22. > > Patch 12/22 depends on patch 11/22. > > Patch 13/22 to 18/22 are independent, pulling common code in functions. > But patch 21/22 uses these APIs in sample driver, so has to be before that. > > Patch 19/22 adds basic documentation. > Patch 21/22 depends on 19/22 patch because that adds sample driver and > its explanation to documentation. Ouch, I get it now, sorry. I was compiling on ppc64 and everything related to iommu type1 (i.e. x86) just got skipped. -- Alexey