From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgross@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/pci: try to reserve MCFG areas earlier
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:19:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc3da154-d451-02cf-6154-5e0dc721a6e6@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d3bf854-51de-99e4-9a40-a64c581bdd10@citrix.com>
On 9/8/19 7:37 PM, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> On 09/09/2019 00:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 9/8/19 5:11 PM, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2019 19:28, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>> On 9/6/19 7:00 PM, Igor Druzhinin wrote:
>>>>> On 06/09/2019 23:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>>>> Where is MCFG parsed? pci_arch_init()?
>>>>>>> It happens twice:
>>>>> 1) first time early one in pci_arch_init() that is arch_initcall - that
>>>>> time pci_mmcfg_list will be freed immediately there because MCFG area is
>>>>> not reserved in E820;
>>>>> 2) second time late one in acpi_init() which is subsystem_initcall right
>>>>> before where PCI enumeration starts - this time ACPI tables will be
>>>>> checked for a reserved resource and pci_mmcfg_list will be finally
>>>>> populated.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem is that on a system that doesn't have MCFG area reserved in
>>>>> E820 pci_mmcfg_list is empty before acpi_init() and our PCI hooks are
>>>>> called in the same place. So MCFG is still not in use by Xen at this
>>>>> point since we haven't reached our xen_mcfg_late().
>>>> Would it be possible for us to parse MCFG ourselves in pci_xen_init()? I
>>>> realize that we'd be doing this twice (or maybe even three times since
>>>> apparently both pci_arch_init() and acpi_ini() do it).
>>>>
>>> I don't thine it makes sense:
>>> a) it needs to be done after ACPI is initialized since we need to parse
>>> it to figure out the exact reserved region - that's why it's currently
>>> done in acpi_init() (see commit message for the reasons why)
>> Hmm... We should be able to parse ACPI tables by the time
>> pci_arch_init() is called. In fact, if you look at
>> pci_mmcfg_early_init() you will see that it does just that.
>>
> The point is not to parse MCFG after acpi_init but to parse DSDT for
> reserved resource which could be done only after ACPI initialization.
OK, I think I understand now what you are trying to do --- you are
essentially trying to account for the range inserted by
setup_mcfg_map(), right?
The other question I have is why you think it's worth keeping
xen_mcfg_late() as a late initcall. How could MCFG info be updated
between acpi_init() and late_initcalls being run? I'd think it can only
happen when a new device is hotplugged.
-boris
>
>>> b) given (a) we cannot do it ourselves before acpi_init and after is too
>>> late as we're already past ACPI PCI enumeration
>>> c) we'd have to do it in the same place I call xen_mcfg_late() and it'd
>>> be code duplication of what's already done by the existing code.
>>
>> If we manage to parse MCFG ourselves early then maybe we won't not need
>> xen_mcfg_late()? We can call PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved right away.
> Again, this cannot be done untile acpi_init finishes basic setup to
> parse DSDT.
>
> Igor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-09 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 0:20 [PATCH] xen/pci: try to reserve MCFG areas earlier Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-04 9:08 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-04 11:36 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-04 12:09 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-06 22:30 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-06 23:00 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-08 18:28 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-08 21:11 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-08 23:30 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-08 23:37 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-09 19:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2019-09-09 21:48 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 1:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-10 9:46 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 9:55 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-10 10:08 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 17:48 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-10 20:36 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-10 21:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2019-09-11 1:15 ` Igor Druzhinin
2019-09-11 9:13 ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-12 17:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc3da154-d451-02cf-6154-5e0dc721a6e6@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=igor.druzhinin@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).