From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: vchiq: Performance regression since 5.18-rc1
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 11:28:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc69ee03-1a74-c15d-ec94-da3b987ab8b1@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77d6d498-7dd9-03eb-60f2-d7e682bb1b20@i2se.com>
[TLDR: I'm adding this regression report to the list of tracked
regressions; all text from me you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already already in similar form.]
Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker.
On 22.05.22 01:22, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
> while testing the staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm driver with
> my Raspberry Pi 3 B+ (multi_v7_defconfig) i noticed a huge performance
> regression since [ff042f4a9b050895a42cae893cc01fa2ca81b95c] mm:
> lru_cache_disable: replace work queue synchronization with synchronize_rcu
>
> Usually i run "vchiq_test -f 1" to see the driver is still working [1].
>
> Before commit:
>
> real 0m1,500s
> user 0m0,068s
> sys 0m0,846s
>
> After commit:
>
> real 7m11,449s
> user 0m2,049s
> sys 0m0,023s
Thanks for the report.
To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm
adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot:
#regzbot ^introduced ff042f4a9b050895a42cae893cc01fa2ca81b95
#regzbot title mm: chiq_test runs 7 minutes instead of ~ 1 second.
#regzbot ignore-activity
This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also
telling regzbot about it, as explained here:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/tracked-regression/
Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags
pointing to the report (the mail this one replied to), as the kernel's
documentation call for; above page explains why this is important for
tracked regressions.
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-21 23:22 vchiq: Performance regression since 5.18-rc1 Stefan Wahren
2022-05-21 23:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-22 15:11 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23 4:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-23 6:19 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23 9:29 ` Phil Elwell
2022-05-23 10:48 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23 11:01 ` Phil Elwell
2022-05-23 11:15 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23 11:22 ` Phil Elwell
2022-05-23 7:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-25 13:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-25 14:07 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-25 14:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-25 15:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-25 15:37 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-29 22:47 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-30 9:54 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-23 9:28 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc69ee03-1a74-c15d-ec94-da3b987ab8b1@leemhuis.info \
--to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).