archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepak Kumar Singh <>
To: Stephen Boyd <>,
	Bjorn Andersson <>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <>,,,,,
	Andy Gross <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/1] soc: qcom: smp2p: Add wakeup capability to SMP2P IRQ
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:41:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 8/11/2021 9:55 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-08-10 16:11:10)
>> On Tue 10 Aug 14:18 CDT 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Sibi Sankar (2021-08-10 10:24:32)
>>>> On 2021-08-09 23:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>> Quoting Deepak Kumar Singh (2021-08-09 04:05:08)
>>>>>> On 8/6/2021 1:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>>>> Quoting Deepak Kumar Singh (2021-08-05 09:17:33)
>>>>>>>> Some use cases require SMP2P interrupts to wake up the host
>>>>>>>> from suspend.
>>>>>>> Please elaborate on this point so we understand what sort of scenarios
>>>>>>> want to wakeup from suspend.
>>>>>> Once such scenario is where WiFi/modem crashes and notifies crash to
>>>>>> local host through smp2p
>>>>>> if local host is in suspend it should wake up to handle the crash and
>>>>>> reboot the WiFi/modem.
>>>>> Does anything go wrong if the firmware crashes during suspend and the
>>>>> local host doesn't handle it until it wakes for some other reason? I'd
>>>>> like to understand if the crash handling can be delayed/combined with
>>>>> another wakeup.
>>>> If the modem firmware crashes
>>>> during suspend, the system comes
>>>> out of xo-shutdown and AFAIK stays
>>>> there until we handle the interrupt.
>>> So you're saying we waste power if we don't wakeup the AP and leave the
>>> SoC in a shallow low power state? That would be good to have indicated
>>> in the code via a comment and in the commit text so we know that we want
>>> to handle the wakeup by default.
>> Sounds like in a system without autosleep (or userspace equivalent) it
>> would be desirable to leave the SoC in this lower state than to wake up
>> the system handle the crash and then just idle?
>> But leaving the system in this state will result in you missing your
>> important phone calls...
> Yes I think we should just add a comment to the code and commit text and
> move on.
Thanks, updated in patch set V2

      reply	other threads:[~2021-08-16 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-05 16:17 [PATCH V1 1/1] soc: qcom: smp2p: Add wakeup capability to SMP2P IRQ Deepak Kumar Singh
2021-08-05 19:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-09 11:05   ` Deepak Kumar Singh
2021-08-09 17:58     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-10 17:24       ` Sibi Sankar
2021-08-10 19:18         ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-10 23:11           ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-08-11  4:25             ` Stephen Boyd
2021-08-16 11:11               ` Deepak Kumar Singh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).