From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] SEV-ES hypervisor support
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:22:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bee6fdda-d548-8af5-f029-25c22165bf84@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914225951.GM7192@sjchrist-ice>
On 9/14/20 5:59 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 03:15:14PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>>
>> This patch series provides support for running SEV-ES guests under KVM.
>
> From the x86/VMX side of things, the GPR hooks are the only changes that I
> strongly dislike.
>
> For the vmsa_encrypted flag and related things like allow_debug(), I'd
> really like to aim for a common implementation between SEV-ES and TDX[*] from
> the get go, within reason obviously. From a code perspective, I don't think
> it will be too onerous as the basic tenets are quite similar, e.g. guest
> state is off limits, FPU state is autoswitched, etc..., but I suspect (or
> maybe worry?) that there are enough minor differences that we'll want a more
> generic way of marking ioctls() as disallowed to avoid having one-off checks
> all over the place.
>
> That being said, it may also be that there are some ioctls() that should be
> disallowed under SEV-ES, but aren't in this series. E.g. I assume
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl_smi() should be rejected as KVM can't do the necessary
> emulation (I assume this applies to vanilla SEV as well?).
Right, SMM isn't currently supported under SEV-ES. SEV does support SMM,
though, since the register state can be altered to change over to the SMM
register state. So the SMI ioctl() is ok for SEV.
>
> One thought to try and reconcile the differences between SEV-ES and TDX would
> be expicitly list which ioctls() are and aren't supported and go from there?
> E.g. if there is 95% overlap than we probably don't need to get fancy with
> generic allow/deny.
>
> Given that we don't yet have publicly available KVM code for TDX, what if I
> generate and post a list of ioctls() that are denied by either SEV-ES or TDX,
> organized by the denier(s)? Then for the ioctls() that are denied by one and
> not the other, we add a brief explanation of why it's denied?
>
> If that sounds ok, I'll get the list and the TDX side of things posted
> tomorrow.
That sounds good.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> [*] https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsoftware.intel.com%2Fcontent%2Fwww%2Fus%2Fen%2Fdevelop%2Farticles%2Fintel-trust-domain-extensions.html&data=02%7C01%7Cthomas.lendacky%40amd.com%7C000b3d355429471694fa08d85901e575%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637357211966578452&sdata=nEhXcrxY7KmQVCsVJrX20bagZLbzwVqlT%2BYvhSYCjHI%3D&reserved=0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 20:15 [RFC PATCH 00/35] SEV-ES hypervisor support Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 01/35] KVM: SVM: Remove the call to sev_platform_status() during setup Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 02/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES capability in KVM Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 03/35] KVM: SVM: Add indirect access to the VM save area Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 04/35] KVM: SVM: Make GHCB accessor functions available to the hypervisor Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 05/35] KVM: SVM: Add initial support for SEV-ES GHCB access to KVM Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200914205801.GA7084@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-15 13:24 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-15 16:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-16 14:54 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 06/35] KVM: SVM: Add required changes to support intercepts under SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 07/35] KVM: SVM: Modify DRx register intercepts for an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 08/35] KVM: SVM: Prevent debugging under SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 21:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 13:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-15 16:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 20:13 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-16 15:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-16 16:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-16 16:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-16 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-16 20:27 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-16 22:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-17 16:27 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 09/35] KVM: SVM: Do not emulate MMIO " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 21:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 13:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 10/35] KVM: SVM: Cannot re-initialize the VMCB after shutdown with SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 11/35] KVM: SVM: Prepare for SEV-ES exit handling in the sev.c file Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200915172148.GE8420@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-16 16:22 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 12/35] KVM: SVM: Add initial support for a VMGEXIT VMEXIT Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 13/35] KVM: SVM: Create trace events for VMGEXIT processing Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 14/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x002 Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 15/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x004 Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 16/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for SEV-ES GHCB MSR protocol function 0x100 Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 17/35] KVM: SVM: Create trace events for VMGEXIT MSR protocol processing Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 18/35] KVM: SVM: Support MMIO for an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 19/35] KVM: SVM: Support port IO operations " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 20/35] KVM: SVM: Add SEV/SEV-ES support for intercepting INVD Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 15:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 21/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for EFER write traps for an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200914220800.GI7192@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-15 15:45 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 22/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for CR0 " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 15:56 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-11-30 18:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 23/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for CR4 " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-11-30 18:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 24/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for CR8 " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 15:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 25/35] KVM: x86: Update __get_sregs() / __set_sregs() to support SEV-ES Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 21:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 14:19 ` Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200915163342.GC8420@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-15 20:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-15 22:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-11-30 18:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 19:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 26/35] KVM: SVM: Guest FPU state save/restore not needed for SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
[not found] ` <20200914213917.GD7192@sjchrist-ice>
2020-09-15 14:25 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-15 16:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 27/35] KVM: SVM: Add support for booting APs for an " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 28/35] KVM: X86: Update kvm_skip_emulated_instruction() " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 21:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 14:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 29/35] KVM: SVM: Add NMI support " Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 30/35] KVM: SVM: Set the encryption mask for the SVM host save area Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 31/35] KVM: SVM: Update ASID allocation to support SEV-ES guests Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 32/35] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU creation/loading Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 33/35] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SEV-ES vCPU loading Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 34/35] KVM: SVM: Provide an updated VMRUN invocation for SEV-ES guests Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 35/35] KVM: SVM: Provide support to launch and run an SEV-ES guest Tom Lendacky
2020-09-14 22:59 ` [RFC PATCH 00/35] SEV-ES hypervisor support Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 17:22 ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2020-09-15 17:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-09-15 20:05 ` Brijesh Singh
2020-09-16 0:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-13 20:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-11-30 15:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 16:06 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-11-30 18:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-11-30 18:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-11-30 18:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-11-30 19:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-11-30 20:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bee6fdda-d548-8af5-f029-25c22165bf84@amd.com \
--to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).