From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: Extend slab/shrink to shrink all the memcg caches
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 11:14:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf569ee8-1999-97c1-d49f-ef58eef5f62c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190703143701.GR978@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 7/3/19 10:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 03-07-19 09:12:13, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 7/3/19 2:56 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Tue 02-07-19 14:37:30, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>> Currently, a value of '1" is written to /sys/kernel/slab/<slab>/shrink
>>>> file to shrink the slab by flushing all the per-cpu slabs and free
>>>> slabs in partial lists. This applies only to the root caches, though.
>>>>
>>>> Extends this capability by shrinking all the child memcg caches and
>>>> the root cache when a value of '2' is written to the shrink sysfs file.
>>> Why do we need a new value for this functionality? I would tend to think
>>> that skipping memcg caches is a bug/incomplete implementation. Or is it
>>> a deliberate decision to cover root caches only?
>> It is just that I don't want to change the existing behavior of the
>> current code. It will definitely take longer to shrink both the root
>> cache and the memcg caches.
> Does that matter? To whom and why? I do not expect this interface to be
> used heavily.
The only concern that I can see is the fact that I need to take the
slab_mutex when iterating the memcg list to prevent concurrent
modification. That may have some impact on other applications running in
the system. However, I can put a precaution statement on the user-doc to
discuss the potential performance impact.
>> If we all agree that the only sensible
>> operation is to shrink root cache and the memcg caches together. I am
>> fine just adding memcg shrink without changing the sysfs interface
>> definition and be done with it.
> The existing documentation is really modest on the actual semantic:
> Description:
> The shrink file is written when memory should be reclaimed from
> a cache. Empty partial slabs are freed and the partial list is
> sorted so the slabs with the fewest available objects are used
> first.
>
> which to me sounds like all slabs are free and nobody should be really
> thinking of memcgs. This is simply drop_caches kinda thing. We surely do
> not want to drop caches only for the root memcg for /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> right?
>
I am planning to reword the document to make the effect of using this
sysfs file more explicit.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-03 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-02 18:37 [PATCH] mm, slab: Extend slab/shrink to shrink all the memcg caches Waiman Long
2019-07-02 18:39 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-02 19:09 ` David Rientjes
2019-07-02 19:15 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-02 19:30 ` Roman Gushchin
2019-07-02 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-02 20:44 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-02 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-03 15:21 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-03 15:53 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-03 16:16 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-04 7:37 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-03 6:56 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-03 13:12 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-03 14:37 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-03 15:14 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2019-07-03 16:10 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-07-03 16:13 ` Waiman Long
2019-07-22 12:46 ` peter enderborg
2019-07-23 14:30 ` Waiman Long
2019-08-07 16:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf569ee8-1999-97c1-d49f-ef58eef5f62c@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).