From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
qais.yousef@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Jiang Biao <benbjiang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask for task wakeup
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:13:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf7b6dd3-7922-2a4e-8df5-735b24c2dfc7@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jhjlfeyx41f.mognet@arm.com>
On 2020/11/18 20:06, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>
> On 16/11/20 20:04, Aubrey Li wrote:
>> From: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
>>
>> Add idle cpumask to track idle cpus in sched domain. When a CPU
>> enters idle, if the idle driver indicates to stop tick, this CPU
>> is set in the idle cpumask to be a wakeup target. And if the CPU
>> is not in idle, the CPU is cleared in idle cpumask during scheduler
>> tick to ratelimit idle cpumask update.
>>
>> When a task wakes up to select an idle cpu, scanning idle cpumask
>> has low cost than scanning all the cpus in last level cache domain,
>> especially when the system is heavily loaded.
>>
>> Benchmarks were tested on a x86 4 socket system with 24 cores per
>> socket and 2 hyperthreads per core, total 192 CPUs. Hackbench and
>> schbench have no notable change, uperf has:
>>
>> uperf throughput: netperf workload, tcp_nodelay, r/w size = 90
>>
>> threads baseline-avg %std patch-avg %std
>> 96 1 0.83 1.23 3.27
>> 144 1 1.03 1.67 2.67
>> 192 1 0.69 1.81 3.59
>> 240 1 2.84 1.51 2.67
>>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
>> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
>> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
>> Cc: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
>
> That's missing a v3 -> v4 change summary
>
okay, I'll add in the next version soon.
Thanks,
-Aubrey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-16 20:04 [RFC PATCH v4] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask for task wakeup Aubrey Li
2020-11-18 12:06 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-11-19 1:13 ` Li, Aubrey [this message]
2020-11-18 13:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-19 1:34 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-19 8:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-19 11:41 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-22 14:03 ` [sched/fair] 8d86968ac3: hackbench.throughput 51.7% improvement kernel test robot
2020-11-25 9:09 ` [sched/fair] 8d86968ac3: netperf.Throughput_tps -29.5% regression kernel test robot
2020-11-26 6:57 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-26 12:13 ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-02 14:29 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-02 14:48 ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-02 16:22 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf7b6dd3-7922-2a4e-8df5-735b24c2dfc7@linux.intel.com \
--to=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=benbjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).