From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263873AbTJ1IXv (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:23:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263876AbTJ1IXv (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:23:51 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:432 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263873AbTJ1IXu (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 03:23:50 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Holger Schurig Subject: Re: status of ipchains in 2.6? Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:23:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200310280127.h9S1RM5d002140@napali.hpl.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Unlike ipchains, iptables works perfectly fine, so perhaps we just > need to update Kconfig to discourage ipchains on ia64 (and/or other > 64-bit platforms)? Perhaps we simply drop ipchains support for good? -- Try Linux 2.6 from BitKeeper for PXA2x0 CPUs at http://www.mn-logistik.de/unsupported/linux-2.6/