From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272741AbTG1IoJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:44:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272743AbTG1IoJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:44:09 -0400 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.202]:45736 "EHLO TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272741AbTG1IoG (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:44:06 -0400 To: "Ihar \"Philips\" Filipau" Cc: Hollis Blanchard , Otto Solares , "J.A. Magallon" , Alan Cox , David McCullough , uclinux-dev@uclinux.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()? References: <9CA735B0-BEAD-11D7-BEDE-000A95A0560C@us.ibm.com> <3F24DB59.1010600@softhome.net> Reply-To: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop From: Miles Bader Date: 28 Jul 2003 17:58:25 +0900 In-Reply-To: <3F24DB59.1010600@softhome.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Ihar \"Philips\" Filipau" writes: > starting from -O3 gcc do always trys to do inlining. > was observed on gcc 3.2 and I beleive I saw the same 2.95.3 > > compile this test with 02 & 03: Um, what's your point? -Miles -- If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. [George Carlin]