From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754761AbcKAWOJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:14:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:34054 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751126AbcKAWOH (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:14:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: Driver for Toshiba et8ek8 5MP sensor To: Sakari Ailus References: <20161023200355.GA5391@amd> <20161023201954.GI9460@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20161023203315.GC6391@amd> <20161031225408.GB3217@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <7bf0bd23-e7fc-8dae-8d57-2477b942acbc@gmail.com> <20161101201122.GF3217@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> Cc: Pavel Machek , sre@kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, galak@codeaurora.org, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ivaylo Dimitrov Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 00:14:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161101201122.GF3217@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1.11.2016 22:11, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Ivaylo, > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:36:57AM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 1.11.2016 00:54, Sakari Ailus wrote: >>> Hi Pavel, >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:33:15PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>>> Thanks, this answered half of my questions already. ;-) >>>> >>>> :-). >>>> >>>> I'll have to go through the patches, et8ek8 driver is probably not >>>> enough to get useful video. platform/video-bus-switch.c is needed for >>>> camera switching, then some omap3isp patches to bind flash and >>>> autofocus into the subdevice. >>>> >>>> Then, device tree support on n900 can be added. >>> >>> I briefly discussed with with Sebastian. >>> >>> Do you think the elusive support for the secondary camera is worth keeping >>> out the main camera from the DT in mainline? As long as there's a reasonable >>> way to get it working, I'd just merge that. If someone ever gets the >>> secondary camera working properly and nicely with the video bus switch, >>> that's cool, we'll somehow deal with the problem then. But frankly I don't >>> think it's very useful even if we get there: the quality is really bad. >>> >> >> Yes, lets merge what we have till now, it will be way easier to improve on >> it once it is part of the mainline. >> >> BTW, I have (had) patched VBS working almost without problems, when it comes >> to it I'll dig it. > > I wonder if I'm the only one who wonders what VBS is here. Don't tell me its > the old MS thing. :-) ;-) > Oh, sorry, I thought that V(ideo) B(us) S(witch) is clear in the context :)