From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932909AbcLINP5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:15:57 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:33021 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752625AbcLINPz (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:15:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] spi-nor: Add support for Intel SPI serial flash controller To: Mika Westerberg , Lee Jones References: <20161128120626.130693-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20161205112727.GI1459@lahna.fi.intel.com> <2dac1535-de7f-47c3-2747-ba8cac854811@gmail.com> <20161205163106.GJ1459@lahna.fi.intel.com> <62db8daa-7ebf-1a42-bd70-897c3c636e3c@atmel.com> <20161206094525.GA25385@dell.home> <20161207085330.GN1459@lahna.fi.intel.com> <0695162f-0959-ab2c-4e68-14881e386060@gmail.com> <20161209085753.GC3625@dell.home> <20161209122541.GN1501@lahna.fi.intel.com> Cc: Cyrille Pitchen , Boris Brezillon , Richard Weinberger , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , Peter Tyser , key.seong.lim@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:15:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161209122541.GN1501@lahna.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/09/2016 01:25 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 08:57:53AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: >> >>> On 12/07/2016 09:53 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:45:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> I'm happy either way. However if you take them, I will require a >>>>> pull-request to an immutable branch containing only these patches. >>>>> >>>>> If I take them, it won't be until v4.11, since we are half way though >>>>> -rc8 already and I would like them to soak in -next for at least a >>>>> couple of weeks. >>>> >>>> This series already missed v4.8 and v4.9 so I don't think there is a >>>> rush to get it for v4.10 either ;-) I'm fine if it goes for v4.11. >>> >>> Hmmmmmmmmmmm, that kinda sucks. Lee, are you positive this isn't 4.10 >>> material ? >> >> The merge-window opens in 2 days. >> >> As I mentioned, I like patches to reside in -next for at least 1 maybe >> 2 RC cycles before merging. It's far to easy to accept code, then get >> bitten if/when it breaks after being merged by Linus. > > I agree. Better to give it some time in linux-next. > > Can you queue this series for v4.11? OK, I'm fine with this. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut