linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu-topology: warn if NUMA configurations conflicts with lower layer
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 18:20:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0e82c31-8ed6-4739-6b01-2594c58df95a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66943c82-2cfd-351b-7f36-5aefdb196a03@arm.com>

On 03/01/2020 13:14, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 03/01/2020 10:57, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> I'm juggling with other things atm, but let me have a think and see if we
>> couldn't detect that in the scheduler itself.

If this is a common problem, we should detect it in the scheduler rather than in
the arch code.

> Something like this ought to catch your case; might need to compare group
> spans rather than pure group pointers.
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 6ec1e595b1d4..c4151e11afcd 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -1120,6 +1120,13 @@ build_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
>  
>  		sg = get_group(i, sdd);
>  
> +		/* sg's are inited as self-looping. If 'last' is not self
> +		 * looping, we set it in a previous visit. No further visit
> +		 * should change the link order, if we do then the topology
> +		 * description is terminally broken.
> +		 */
> +		BUG_ON(last && last->next != last && last->next != sg);
> +
>  		cpumask_or(covered, covered, sched_group_span(sg));
>  
>  		if (!first)
> 

Still don't see the actual problem case. The closest I came is:

qemu-system-aarch64 -kernel ... -append ' ... loglevel=8 sched_debug'
-smp cores=4,sockets=2 ... -numa node,cpus=0-2,nodeid=0
-numa node,cpus=3-7,nodeid=1

but this behaves sane. Since DIE and NUMA have the same span, the former degenerates.

[    0.654451] CPU0 attaching sched-domain(s):
[    0.654483]  domain-0: span=0-2 level=MC
[    0.654635]   groups: 0:{ span=0 cap=1008 }, 1:{ span=1 cap=1015 }, 2:{ span=2 cap=1014 }
[    0.654787]   domain-1: span=0-7 level=NUMA
[    0.654805]    groups: 0:{ span=0-2 cap=3037 }, 3:{ span=3-7 cap=5048 }
[    0.655326] CPU1 attaching sched-domain(s):
[    0.655339]  domain-0: span=0-2 level=MC
[    0.655356]   groups: 1:{ span=1 cap=1015 }, 2:{ span=2 cap=1014 }, 0:{ span=0 cap=1008 }
[    0.655391]   domain-1: span=0-7 level=NUMA
[    0.655407]    groups: 0:{ span=0-2 cap=3037 }, 3:{ span=3-7 cap=5048 }
[    0.655480] CPU2 attaching sched-domain(s):
[    0.655492]  domain-0: span=0-2 level=MC
[    0.655507]   groups: 2:{ span=2 cap=1014 }, 0:{ span=0 cap=1008 }, 1:{ span=1 cap=1015 }
[    0.655541]   domain-1: span=0-7 level=NUMA
[    0.655556]    groups: 0:{ span=0-2 cap=3037 }, 3:{ span=3-7 cap=5048 }
[    0.655603] CPU3 attaching sched-domain(s):
[    0.655614]  domain-0: span=3-7 level=MC
[    0.655628]   groups: 3:{ span=3 cap=984 }, 4:{ span=4 cap=1015 }, 5:{ span=5 cap=1016 }, 6:{ span=6 cap=1016 }, 7:{ span=7 cap=1017 }
[    0.655693]   domain-1: span=0-7 level=NUMA
[    0.655721]    groups: 3:{ span=3-7 cap=5048 }, 0:{ span=0-2 cap=3037 }
[    0.655769] CPU4 attaching sched-domain(s):
[    0.655780]  domain-0: span=3-7 level=MC
[    0.655795]   groups: 4:{ span=4 cap=1015 }, 5:{ span=5 cap=1016 }, 6:{ span=6 cap=1016 }, 7:{ span=7 cap=1017 }, 3:{ span=3 cap=984 }
[    0.655841]   domain-1: span=0-7 level=NUMA
[    0.655855]    groups: 3:{ span=3-7 cap=5048 }, 0:{ span=0-2 cap=3037 }
[    0.655902] CPU5 attaching sched-domain(s):
[    0.655916]  domain-0: span=3-7 level=MC
[    0.655930]   groups: 5:{ span=5 cap=1016 }, 6:{ span=6 cap=1016 }, 7:{ span=7 cap=1017 }, 3:{ span=3 cap=984 }, 4:{ span=4 cap=1015 }
[    0.656545]   domain-1: span=0-7 level=NUMA
[    0.656562]    groups: 3:{ span=3-7 cap=5048 }, 0:{ span=0-2 cap=3037 }
[    0.656775] CPU6 attaching sched-domain(s):
[    0.656796]  domain-0: span=3-7 level=MC
[    0.656835]   groups: 6:{ span=6 cap=1016 }, 7:{ span=7 cap=1017 }, 3:{ span=3 cap=984 }, 4:{ span=4 cap=1015 }, 5:{ span=5 cap=1016 }
[    0.656881]   domain-1: span=0-7 level=NUMA
[    0.656911]    groups: 3:{ span=3-7 cap=5048 }, 0:{ span=0-2 cap=3037 }
[    0.657102] CPU7 attaching sched-domain(s):
[    0.657113]  domain-0: span=3-7 level=MC
[    0.657128]   groups: 7:{ span=7 cap=1017 }, 3:{ span=3 cap=984 }, 4:{ span=4 cap=1015 }, 5:{ span=5 cap=1016 }, 6:{ span=6 cap=1016 }
[    0.657172]   domain-1: span=0-7 level=NUMA
[    0.657186]    groups: 3:{ span=3-7 cap=5048 }, 0:{ span=0-2 cap=3037 }
[    0.657241] root domain span: 0-7 (max cpu_capacity = 1024)

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-03 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-23  8:16 [PATCH] cpu-topology: warn if NUMA configurations conflicts with lower layer z00214469
2019-12-31 16:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-02  3:05   ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-02 11:29     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-02 12:47       ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-02 13:22         ` Valentin Schneider
2020-01-02 19:30           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-01-03  4:24           ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-03 10:57             ` Valentin Schneider
2020-01-03 12:14               ` Valentin Schneider
2020-01-03 17:20                 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2020-01-06  1:48                   ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-06 14:31                     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-01-08  2:19                       ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-09 11:05                       ` Morten Rasmussen
2020-01-09 12:07                         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-01-06  1:52                 ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-03 11:40             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-06  1:37               ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-09 10:43                 ` Morten Rasmussen
2020-01-09 12:58                   ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-11 20:56                     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-01-13  6:51                       ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-13 11:16                         ` Valentin Schneider
2020-01-13 12:08                           ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-13 12:22                             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-01-13 14:49                       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-01-13 15:15                         ` Valentin Schneider
2020-01-09 10:52           ` Morten Rasmussen
2020-01-12 13:22             ` Valentin Schneider
2020-01-13 13:22               ` Morten Rasmussen
2020-01-02 13:59         ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0e82c31-8ed6-4739-6b01-2594c58df95a@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).