From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 4.10-rc2 oops in DRM connector code
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:24:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c14a88a1-ecc1-5727-5e74-6e9bf4fdc3ca@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170111074338.rapmbctzne2da6vm@phenom.ffwll.local>
On 01/10/2017 11:43 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:52:47AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 01/10/2017 02:31 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> commit e73ab00e9a0f1731f34d0620a9c55f5c30c4ad4e
>>> Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>>> Date: Sun Dec 18 14:35:45 2016 +0100
>>>
>>> drm: prevent double-(un)registration for connectors
>>>
>>> Lack of that would perfectly explain that oops ... Otherwise still no idea
>>> what's going wrong.
>> No... That's not in mainline as far as I can see. Should I test with
>> it applied?
> Hm, I guess failed to cc: stable that one properly, iirc we decided the
> race fix is too academic and can't be hit in reality ;-)
>
> Testing would be great. Probably conflicts because we extracted
> drm_connector.c only recently, but running s/drm_connector\.c/drm_crtc.c/
> over the diff and then applying with some fudge should take care of that.
It doesn't apply to mainline, with or without the substitution you suggest.
Do you want that commit itself tested from -next?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-11 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-05 19:03 4.10-rc2 oops in DRM connector code Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 10:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-01-09 12:59 ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 13:40 ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 13:46 ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 16:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-09 16:50 ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 16:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-09 17:22 ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 19:34 ` Alex Deucher
2017-01-09 17:42 ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-10 10:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-10 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-11 7:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-11 15:24 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2017-01-11 15:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-11 16:16 ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-11 22:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-11 15:40 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c14a88a1-ecc1-5727-5e74-6e9bf4fdc3ca@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).