linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Andy Gross" <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec out of 'struct device'
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 19:04:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1a0d107-39a2-a25d-ec41-1e5aec68c5ec@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200306100955.GB50020@myrica>

On 2020/3/6 18:09, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 04:39:37PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Hi Joerg,
>>
>> On 2020/2/28 23:08, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> here is a patch-set to rename iommu_param to dev_iommu and
>>> establish it as a struct for generic per-device iommu-data.
>>> Also move the iommu_fwspec pointer from struct device into
>>> dev_iommu to have less iommu-related pointers in struct
>>> device.
>>>
>>> The bigger part of this patch-set moves the iommu_priv
>>> pointer from struct iommu_fwspec to dev_iommu, making is
>>> usable for iommu-drivers which do not use fwspecs.
>>>
>>> The changes for that were mostly straightforward, except for
>>> the arm-smmu (_not_ arm-smmu-v3) and the qcom iommu driver.
>>> Unfortunatly I don't have the hardware for those, so any
>>> testing of these drivers is greatly appreciated.
>>
>> I tested this patch set on Kunpeng 920 ARM64 server which
>> using smmu-v3 with ACPI booting, but triggered a NULL
>> pointer dereference and panic at boot:
> 
> I think that's because patch 01/14 move the fwspec access too early. In 
> 
>                 err = pci_for_each_dma_alias(to_pci_dev(dev),
>                                              iort_pci_iommu_init, &info);
> 
>                 if (!err && iort_pci_rc_supports_ats(node))
>                         dev->iommu_fwspec->flags |= IOMMU_FWSPEC_PCI_RC_ATS;
> 
> the iommu_fwspec is only valid if iort_pci_iommu_init() initialized it
> successfully, if err == 0. The following might fix it:

Good catch :)

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index 0e981d7f3c7d..7d04424189df 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev)
>  		return ops;
> 
>  	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> -		struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> +		struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec;
>  		struct pci_bus *bus = to_pci_dev(dev)->bus;
>  		struct iort_pci_alias_info info = { .dev = dev };
> 
> @@ -1028,7 +1028,8 @@ const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev)
>  		err = pci_for_each_dma_alias(to_pci_dev(dev),
>  					     iort_pci_iommu_init, &info);
> 
> -		if (!err && iort_pci_rc_supports_ats(node))
> +		fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> +		if (fwspec && iort_pci_rc_supports_ats(node))
>  			fwspec->flags |= IOMMU_FWSPEC_PCI_RC_ATS;
>  	} else {
>  		int i = 0;

And the panic disappeared. Joerg, please feel free to add my Tested-by
for smmu-v3 and IORT ACPI patches with above changes.

> 
> 
> Note that this use of iommu_fwspec will be removed by the ATS cleanup
> series [1], but this change should work as a temporary fix.

Yes, as your patch set will set the ats_supported flag in the
host bridge level, not per device, nice cleanup.

Thanks
Hanjun


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-06 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-28 15:08 [PATCH 00/14] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec out of 'struct device' Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 01/14] ACPI/IORT: Remove direct access of dev->iommu_fwspec Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/msm/mdp5: " Joerg Roedel
2020-02-29  3:04   ` kbuild test robot
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 03/14] iommu/tegra-gart: " Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 04/14] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix uninitilized variable warning Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 05/14] iommu: Rename struct iommu_param to dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 06/14] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec to struct dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 07/14] iommu: Introduce accessors for iommu private data Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 08/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use accessor functions " Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 09/14] iommu/arm-smmu: " Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 10/14] iommu/renesas: " Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 11/14] iommu/mediatek: " Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 12/14] iommu/qcom: " Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 13/14] iommu/virtio: " Joerg Roedel
2020-02-28 15:08 ` [PATCH 14/14] iommu: Move fwspec->iommu_priv to struct dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-03-03 19:16 ` [PATCH 00/14] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec out of 'struct device' Will Deacon
2020-03-04 13:27   ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-06  8:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2020-03-06 10:09   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-03-06 11:04     ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2020-03-09 16:32     ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c1a0d107-39a2-a25d-ec41-1e5aec68c5ec@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).