From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCB7C28CC0 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 20:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A97622389 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 20:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=digitalocean.com header.i=@digitalocean.com header.b="hKVDrehS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726892AbfE2Uh3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 16:37:29 -0400 Received: from mail-it1-f194.google.com ([209.85.166.194]:50829 "EHLO mail-it1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726839AbfE2UhT (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2019 16:37:19 -0400 Received: by mail-it1-f194.google.com with SMTP id a186so6289176itg.0 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 13:37:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=digitalocean.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :in-reply-to:references; bh=yEC2+0WbuuZvbN9MF45zkkqCR1Y7Z1sJ51mOopvbHAk=; b=hKVDrehSDieR9MoJvSMG7Xqzi1n92lgzoTohYWiGf/plciqM42g2cQZnvd/w3NkoF7 hZgv6jpp9pj45C+kYb8bhqxE0M/gqLrLuQD99z+p62vx1/+b9FDY/4bqoA58/wiIywPQ YUXDo1hMYdigFK37dWXScJgMJe+nHzTu9lrQY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:in-reply-to:references; bh=yEC2+0WbuuZvbN9MF45zkkqCR1Y7Z1sJ51mOopvbHAk=; b=FcmMOY+4XH2YSXV6sZQlLMegYh69lwwMqTuWa/rFxeIeaK8n0fOWM/+nB2WMxuw3rs sPoLnRSNEqYkSF00ybME5sBPU6S83hTEyq6K2FxHQlAqPxPc2FT0p91Zk2DboYrnItfG cXN9+zb2jEZWWxkigxlalC45lH91azi3jcTqyNUFX0n59505S0pHcHllrJHxdirB79t4 Enj9MTbHuRu3Uxsbmr1VmVcYVrdFrAj6FgzAkMX30gPxYjVblxG0IYHz44P5k1Pqtm9Y Zm3GWbWwvukiSWeAotFD5OflH6AllausbUIxW/MuT5OQMVO/08GxC0ph0OFCRLWrnKpD T/mw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU8F5rgfR5MPQcitL3G7ithDupyhE69Tj+VjKWQl4f8GrGgmnUe daAcS6cYL9/KRHt1NJ4dGftjKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzpHUgm1M0B0O7mm8LRVDyAgyq6PZCteW6QL0Isd7Qi9BjXYkORb5rlea6kiWaBAqi50Uo5aw== X-Received: by 2002:a02:2b1d:: with SMTP id h29mr28154932jaa.76.1559162233048; Wed, 29 May 2019 13:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from swap-tester ([178.128.225.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k203sm159596itk.41.2019.05.29.13.37.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 May 2019 13:37:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Vineeth Remanan Pillai To: Nishanth Aravamudan , Julien Desfossez , Peter Zijlstra , Tim Chen , mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, pjt@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kerrnel@google.com, Phil Auld , Aaron Lu , Aubrey Li , Valentin Schneider , Mel Gorman , Pawan Gupta , Paolo Bonzini Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 16/16] sched: Debug bits... Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 20:36:52 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra Not-Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- kernel/sched/core.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 5b8223c9a723..90655c9ad937 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ static inline bool prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b) int pa = __task_prio(a), pb = __task_prio(b); + trace_printk("(%s/%d;%d,%Lu,%Lu) ?< (%s/%d;%d,%Lu,%Lu)\n", + a->comm, a->pid, pa, a->se.vruntime, a->dl.deadline, + b->comm, b->pid, pb, b->se.vruntime, b->dl.deadline); + if (-pa < -pb) return true; @@ -246,6 +250,8 @@ static void __sched_core_enable(void) static_branch_enable(&__sched_core_enabled); stop_machine(__sched_core_stopper, (void *)true, NULL); + + printk("core sched enabled\n"); } static void __sched_core_disable(void) @@ -254,6 +260,8 @@ static void __sched_core_disable(void) stop_machine(__sched_core_stopper, (void *)false, NULL); static_branch_disable(&__sched_core_enabled); + + printk("core sched disabled\n"); } void sched_core_get(void) @@ -3707,6 +3715,14 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) put_prev_task(rq, prev); set_next_task(rq, next); } + + trace_printk("pick pre selected (%u %u %u): %s/%d %lx\n", + rq->core->core_task_seq, + rq->core->core_pick_seq, + rq->core_sched_seq, + next->comm, next->pid, + next->core_cookie); + return next; } @@ -3786,6 +3802,9 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) */ if (i == cpu && !need_sync && !p->core_cookie) { next = p; + trace_printk("unconstrained pick: %s/%d %lx\n", + next->comm, next->pid, next->core_cookie); + goto done; } @@ -3794,6 +3813,9 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) rq_i->core_pick = p; + trace_printk("cpu(%d): selected: %s/%d %lx\n", + i, p->comm, p->pid, p->core_cookie); + /* * If this new candidate is of higher priority than the * previous; and they're incompatible; we need to wipe @@ -3810,6 +3832,8 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) rq->core->core_cookie = p->core_cookie; max = p; + trace_printk("max: %s/%d %lx\n", max->comm, max->pid, max->core_cookie); + if (old_max) { for_each_cpu(j, smt_mask) { if (j == i) @@ -3837,6 +3861,7 @@ next_class:; rq->core->core_pick_seq = rq->core->core_task_seq; next = rq->core_pick; rq->core_sched_seq = rq->core->core_pick_seq; + trace_printk("picked: %s/%d %lx\n", next->comm, next->pid, next->core_cookie); /* * Reschedule siblings @@ -3862,11 +3887,20 @@ next_class:; if (i == cpu) continue; - if (rq_i->curr != rq_i->core_pick) + if (rq_i->curr != rq_i->core_pick) { + trace_printk("IPI(%d)\n", i); resched_curr(rq_i); + } /* Did we break L1TF mitigation requirements? */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(!cookie_match(next, rq_i->core_pick)); + if (unlikely(!cookie_match(next, rq_i->core_pick))) { + trace_printk("[%d]: cookie mismatch. %s/%d/0x%lx/0x%lx\n", + rq_i->cpu, rq_i->core_pick->comm, + rq_i->core_pick->pid, + rq_i->core_pick->core_cookie, + rq_i->core->core_cookie); + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + } } done: @@ -3905,6 +3939,10 @@ static bool try_steal_cookie(int this, int that) if (p->core_occupation > dst->idle->core_occupation) goto next; + trace_printk("core fill: %s/%d (%d->%d) %d %d %lx\n", + p->comm, p->pid, that, this, + p->core_occupation, dst->idle->core_occupation, cookie); + p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING; deactivate_task(src, p, 0); set_task_cpu(p, this); @@ -6501,6 +6539,8 @@ int sched_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu) WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->core && rq->core != core_rq); rq->core = core_rq; } + + printk("core: %d -> %d\n", cpu, cpu_of(core_rq)); #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */ sched_rq_cpu_starting(cpu); -- 2.17.1