From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:09:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2a3fc9c-82e7-939c-b183-6dd57ccf9444@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220713160238.3bfcdb26@canb.auug.org.au>
On 7/13/22 08:02, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I didn't know if the new includes needed to be prefixed with "../"
> as well ... I though it was better safe than sorry.
If it compiles, it's perfect. :)
Thanks, I'll check it out and report to Linus the reason for the conflict.
Paolo
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-13 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-13 6:02 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13 6:09 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-10 1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-09 0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-13 3:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-30 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22 4:29 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-17 2:56 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02 2:36 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02 8:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-02 10:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-24 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:16 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-04 2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-18 2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06 5:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-04 7:04 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05 2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05 1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 10:47 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 13:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 14:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 14:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-01 15:22 ` Radim Krčmář
2018-02-01 15:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-02 0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-02 17:22 ` Radim Krčmář
2018-01-25 21:07 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 3:48 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 11:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 12:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-29 4:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-29 10:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-25 4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04 6:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-27 4:50 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25 7:25 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09 6:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02 5:05 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02 5:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-01 2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-07 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-02 5:52 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-12 4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-06 5:12 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-13 3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 16:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-11-06 0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01 7:10 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-07-01 7:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-01 12:30 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-01 15:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-07-01 12:31 ` Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c2a3fc9c-82e7-939c-b183-6dd57ccf9444@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luwei.kang@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).