From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80880C43142 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE50208A4 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="qCK4huLV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2AE50208A4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731931AbeGaLpa (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:45:30 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:56038 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727524AbeGaLpa (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:45:30 -0400 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6VA4ehr011625; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 05:04:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1533031480; bh=Oyh4vvZyi4HJFAzG7qfLiCI4dKmRvIgfJ4oKrnmBUgw=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=qCK4huLVkGcj4GqC9fqquYcOS/y4dfaMPLaVhufyG52hRv6dK4sIMyHYhPKartY7+ KXO1xwj5GT6k2zKGk31OgHsHsiuTeOvO87x6pSWK12rEg1VljGZk2dXylwLMttxNVs gluE60pnAiobhCMN0aVxKpB8JJCFFJmKkS0Rk6Nc= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6VA4eHl012361; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 05:04:40 -0500 Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 05:04:39 -0500 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 05:04:39 -0500 Received: from [172.24.190.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6VA4Xqh019783; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 05:04:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Bjorn Andersson CC: Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , David Lechner , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Linux ARM , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-clk , , Bartosz Golaszewski References: <20180621073706.22812-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180621073706.22812-2-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180731042539.GE5090@builder> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 15:34:33 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bjorn, On Tuesday 31 July 2018 01:25 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-07-31 6:25 GMT+02:00 Bjorn Andersson : >> On Thu 21 Jun 00:37 PDT 2018, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >>> >>> Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines >>> we used so far. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski >>> Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori >>> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel >> >> Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson >> > > Sekhar, > > can you take this through your tree or is it already too late? The last -rc is already tagged and I am not sure ARM-SoC will be open to new stuff now (there is also a bit of lag after I send my pull request). Is this something you can take in your tree along with Suman's patch? There are no build dependencies with my tree, so it will be safe to queue from your tree. It will be great if this can be merged late in the cycle though to avoid breaking remoteproc even for short while during the merge window. Or if you okay with it, it will be safest to send it soon after v4.19-rc1 is tagged. Let me know. Thanks, Sekhar