linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] selftests/kvm: add set_boot_cpu_id test
@ 2021-03-17  7:44 Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
  2021-03-17 11:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito @ 2021-03-17  7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kselftest
  Cc: Paolo Bonzini, Shuah Khan, Vitaly Kuznetsov, linux-kernel, kvm

Test for the KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID ioctl.
Check that it correctly allows to change the BSP vcpu.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore        |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   1 +
 .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id.c    | 151 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
index 32b87cc77c8e..43b8aa82aefe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 /s390x/resets
 /s390x/sync_regs_test
 /x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
+/x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id
 /x86_64/debug_regs
 /x86_64/evmcs_test
 /x86_64/get_cpuid_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index a6d61f451f88..e7b62666e06e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ LIBKVM_aarch64 = lib/aarch64/processor.c lib/aarch64/ucall.c
 LIBKVM_s390x = lib/s390x/processor.c lib/s390x/ucall.c lib/s390x/diag318_test_handler.c
 
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 = x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/evmcs_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/get_cpuid_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/hyperv_cpuid
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4077be4e4015
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_boot_cpu_id.c
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Test that KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID works as intended
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2020, Red Hat, Inc.
+ */
+#define _GNU_SOURCE /* for program_invocation_name */
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "processor.h"
+
+#define N_VCPU 2
+#define VCPU_ID0 0
+#define VCPU_ID1 1
+
+#define WRONG_BSP 2
+
+static uint32_t get_bsp_flag(void)
+{
+	return rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APICBASE) & MSR_IA32_APICBASE_BSP;
+}
+
+static void guest_bsp_vcpu(void *arg)
+{
+	GUEST_SYNC(1);
+
+	GUEST_ASSERT(get_bsp_flag() != 0);
+
+	GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+static void guest_not_bsp_vcpu(void *arg)
+{
+	GUEST_SYNC(1);
+
+	GUEST_ASSERT(get_bsp_flag() == 0);
+
+	GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, int stage)
+{
+	struct ucall uc;
+
+	printf("vcpu executing...\n");
+	vcpu_run(vm, vcpuid);
+	printf("vcpu executed\n");
+
+	switch (get_ucall(vm, vcpuid, &uc)) {
+	case UCALL_SYNC:
+		printf("stage %d sync %ld\n", stage, uc.args[1]);
+		TEST_ASSERT(!strcmp((const char *)uc.args[0], "hello") &&
+			    uc.args[1] == stage + 1,
+			    "Stage %d: Unexpected register values vmexit, got %lx",
+			    stage + 1, (ulong)uc.args[1]);
+		return;
+	case UCALL_DONE:
+		printf("got done\n");
+		return;
+	case UCALL_ABORT:
+		TEST_ASSERT(false, "%s at %s:%ld\n\tvalues: %#lx, %#lx", (const char *)uc.args[0],
+			    __FILE__, uc.args[1], uc.args[2], uc.args[3]);
+	default:
+		TEST_ASSERT(false, "Unexpected exit: %s",
+			    exit_reason_str(vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->exit_reason));
+	}
+}
+
+static void check_wrong_bsp(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	int res;
+
+	vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID0, 0, guest_bsp_vcpu);
+
+	res = _kvm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID, (void *) WRONG_BSP);
+	TEST_ASSERT(res == -1, "KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID set to a non-existent vcpu %d", WRONG_BSP);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+static struct kvm_vm *create_vm(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	uint64_t vcpu_pages = (DEFAULT_STACK_PGS) * 2;
+	uint64_t extra_pg_pages = vcpu_pages / PTES_PER_MIN_PAGE * N_VCPU;
+	uint64_t pages = DEFAULT_GUEST_PHY_PAGES + vcpu_pages + extra_pg_pages;
+
+	pages = vm_adjust_num_guest_pages(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, pages);
+	vm = vm_create(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, pages, O_RDWR);
+
+	kvm_vm_elf_load(vm, program_invocation_name, 0, 0);
+	vm_create_irqchip(vm);
+
+	return vm;
+}
+
+static void add_x86_vcpu(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, void *code)
+{
+	vm_vcpu_add_default(vm, vcpuid, code);
+	vcpu_set_cpuid(vm, vcpuid, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
+}
+
+static void run_vm_bsp(uint32_t bsp_vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	int stage;
+	void *vcpu0_code, *vcpu1_code;
+
+	vm = create_vm();
+
+	vcpu0_code = guest_bsp_vcpu;
+	vcpu1_code = guest_not_bsp_vcpu;
+
+	if (bsp_vcpu == VCPU_ID1) {
+		vcpu0_code = guest_not_bsp_vcpu;
+		vcpu1_code = guest_bsp_vcpu;
+
+		vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID, (void *) VCPU_ID1);
+	}
+
+	add_x86_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID0, vcpu0_code);
+	add_x86_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID1, vcpu1_code);
+
+	for (stage = 0; stage < 2; stage++) {
+		run_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID0, stage);
+		run_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID1, stage);
+	}
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	if (!kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID)) {
+		print_skip("set_boot_cpu_id not available");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	run_vm_bsp(VCPU_ID0);
+	run_vm_bsp(VCPU_ID1);
+	run_vm_bsp(VCPU_ID0);
+
+	check_wrong_bsp();
+}
-- 
2.29.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests/kvm: add set_boot_cpu_id test
  2021-03-17  7:44 [PATCH] selftests/kvm: add set_boot_cpu_id test Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
@ 2021-03-17 11:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2021-03-17 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito, linux-kselftest
  Cc: Shuah Khan, Vitaly Kuznetsov, linux-kernel, kvm

On 17/03/21 08:44, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> +	printf("vcpu executing...\n");
> +	vcpu_run(vm, vcpuid);
> +	printf("vcpu executed\n");
> +
> +	switch (get_ucall(vm, vcpuid, &uc)) {
> +	case UCALL_SYNC:
> +		printf("stage %d sync %ld\n", stage, uc.args[1]);
> +		TEST_ASSERT(!strcmp((const char *)uc.args[0], "hello") &&
> +			    uc.args[1] == stage + 1,
> +			    "Stage %d: Unexpected register values vmexit, got %lx",
> +			    stage + 1, (ulong)uc.args[1]);
> +		return;
> +	case UCALL_DONE:
> +		printf("got done\n");

You can remove the printfs here.

> +		return;
> +	case UCALL_ABORT:
> +		TEST_ASSERT(false, "%s at %s:%ld\n\tvalues: %#lx, %#lx", (const char *)uc.args[0],
> +			    __FILE__, uc.args[1], uc.args[2], uc.args[3]);
> +	default:
> +		TEST_ASSERT(false, "Unexpected exit: %s",
> +			    exit_reason_str(vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->exit_reason));
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void add_x86_vcpu(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, void *code)
> +{
> +	vm_vcpu_add_default(vm, vcpuid, code);
> +	vcpu_set_cpuid(vm, vcpuid, kvm_get_supported_cpuid());
> +}
> +
> +static void run_vm_bsp(uint32_t bsp_vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_vm *vm;
> +	int stage;
> +	void *vcpu0_code, *vcpu1_code;
> +
> +	vm = create_vm();
> +
> +	vcpu0_code = guest_bsp_vcpu;
> +	vcpu1_code = guest_not_bsp_vcpu;
> +
> +	if (bsp_vcpu == VCPU_ID1) {
> +		vcpu0_code = guest_not_bsp_vcpu;
> +		vcpu1_code = guest_bsp_vcpu;
> +
> +		vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID, (void *) VCPU_ID1);
> +	}
> +
> +	add_x86_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID0, vcpu0_code);
> +	add_x86_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID1, vcpu1_code);
> +
> +	for (stage = 0; stage < 2; stage++) {
> +		run_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID0, stage);
> +		run_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID1, stage);
> +	}

These are just stylistic nits, but:

1) you could pass a bool to add_x86_vcpu, like

	add_x86_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID0, bsp_vcpu == VCPU_ID0);
	add_x86_vcpu(vm, VCPU_ID1, bsp_vcpu == VCPU_ID1);

instead of having the vcpu0_code and vcpu1_code pointers.

2) you could move the for loop inside run_vcpu.  This way you can assert 
that you get UCALL_DONE when stage == 2.

> +	kvm_vm_free(vm);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +	if (!kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID)) {
> +		print_skip("set_boot_cpu_id not available");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	run_vm_bsp(VCPU_ID0);
> +	run_vm_bsp(VCPU_ID1);
> +	run_vm_bsp(VCPU_ID0);

Looks good!  Just another small change: since this third test is not 
adding much, you could instead invoke KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID(VCPU_ID1) 
*after* the creation of the vCPUs instead of before.  This should fail 
with -EBUSY, and vcpu 0 will remain the BSP.

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-17 11:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-17  7:44 [PATCH] selftests/kvm: add set_boot_cpu_id test Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-03-17 11:01 ` Paolo Bonzini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).