From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Alan Stern' <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: 'Mauro Carvalho Chehab' <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxarm@huawei.com" <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
"mauro.chehab@huawei.com" <mauro.chehab@huawei.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] media: uvc: don't do DMA on stack
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 14:21:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c5dd6d33cb844025bc8451b46980d96b@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210622132922.GB452785@rowland.harvard.edu>
From: Alan Stern
> Sent: 22 June 2021 14:29
...
> > Thought...
> >
> > Is kmalloc(1, GFP_KERNEL) guaranteed to return a pointer into
> > a cache line that will not be accessed by any other code?
> > (This is slightly weaker than requiring a cache-line aligned
> > pointer - but very similar.)
>
> As I understand it, on architectures that do not have cache-coherent
> I/O, kmalloc is guaranteed to return a buffer that is
> cacheline-aligned and whose length is a multiple of the cacheline
> size.
>
> Now, whether that buffer ends up being accessed by any other code
> depends on what your driver does with the pointer it gets from
> kmalloc. :-)
Thanks for the clarification.
Most of the small allocates in the usb stack are for transmits
where it is only necessary to ensure a cache write-back.
I know there has been some confusion because one of the
allocators can add a small header to every allocation.
This can lead to unexpectedly inadequately aligned pointers.
If it is updated when the preceding block is freed (as some
user-space mallocs do) then it would need to be in a
completely separate cache line.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-22 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-21 13:40 [PATCH v3] media: uvc: don't do DMA on stack Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-21 14:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-21 14:34 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-06-22 10:22 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-22 8:07 ` David Laight
2021-06-22 10:12 ` Greg KH
2021-06-22 13:29 ` Alan Stern
2021-06-22 14:21 ` David Laight [this message]
2021-06-22 19:58 ` 'Alan Stern'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c5dd6d33cb844025bc8451b46980d96b@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mauro.chehab@huawei.com \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).