From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B09C5CFE7 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B3320883 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 14B3320883 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389034AbeGJSdn (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:33:43 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51802 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388985AbeGJSdm (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:33:42 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672F9168F; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:17:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e110467-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e110467-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.210.23]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D8B083F589; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:17:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Robin Murphy To: hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI/IORT: Set bus DMA mask as appropriate Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:17:17 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1.dirty In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When an explicit DMA limit is described by firmware, we need to remember it regardless of how drivers might subsequently update their devices' masks. The new bus_dma_mask field does that. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy --- drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c index 4a66896e2aa3..bc51cff5505e 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c @@ -1014,6 +1014,7 @@ void iort_dma_setup(struct device *dev, u64 *dma_addr, u64 *dma_size) * Limit coherent and dma mask based on size * retrieved from firmware. */ + dev->bus_dma_mask = mask; dev->coherent_dma_mask = mask; *dev->dma_mask = mask; } -- 2.17.1.dirty