linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: isaku.yamahata@intel.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: isaku.yamahata@intel.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
	Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 21/26] KVM: x86: Delete kvm_arch_hardware_enable/disable()
Date: Thu,  8 Sep 2022 16:25:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7b28e898623e22f9732c038d93366ecc70e2d33.1662679124.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1662679124.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>

From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>

Now they're function call and there is no point to keep them.
Opportunistically make kvm_arch_pre_hardware_unsetup() empty.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c       | 27 +++++++--------------------
 include/linux/kvm_host.h |  6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 6dcc6ed90421..0c9d965859c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static void kvm_on_user_return(struct user_return_notifier *urn)
 
 	/*
 	 * Disabling irqs at this point since the following code could be
-	 * interrupted and executed through kvm_arch_hardware_disable()
+	 * interrupted and executed through hardware_disable()
 	 */
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	if (msrs->registered) {
@@ -11834,17 +11834,6 @@ void kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector);
 
-int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void)
-{
-	return static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_enable)();
-}
-
-void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void)
-{
-	static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_disable)();
-	drop_user_return_notifiers();
-}
-
 static cpumask_t cpus_hardware_enabled = CPU_MASK_NONE;
 
 static int __hardware_enable(void *caller_name)
@@ -11856,7 +11845,7 @@ static int __hardware_enable(void *caller_name)
 
 	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_hardware_enabled))
 		return 0;
-	r = kvm_arch_hardware_enable();
+	r = static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_enable)();
 	if (r)
 		pr_warn("kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU%d failed during %s()\n",
 			cpu, (const char *)caller_name);
@@ -11882,12 +11871,8 @@ static void hardware_disable(void *junk)
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_hardware_enabled))
 		return;
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpus_hardware_enabled);
-	kvm_arch_hardware_disable();
-}
-
-void kvm_arch_pre_hardware_unsetup(void)
-{
-	on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
+	static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_disable)();
+	drop_user_return_notifiers();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -12019,7 +12004,7 @@ void kvm_arch_resume(int usage_count)
 		return;
 
 	preempt_disable();
-	if (kvm_arch_hardware_enable()) {
+	if (static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_enable)()) {
 		preempt_enable();
 		return;
 	}
@@ -12163,6 +12148,8 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque)
 
 void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void)
 {
+	on_each_cpu(hardware_disable, NULL, 1);
+
 	kvm_unregister_perf_callbacks();
 
 	static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_unsetup)();
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index f538fc3356a9..5f4d6f641b03 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1434,13 +1434,15 @@ void kvm_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct dentry *debugfs_
 static inline void kvm_create_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 #endif
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_OVERRIDE_HARDWARE_ENABLE
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_OVERRIDE_HARDWARE_ENABLE
+static inline void kvm_arch_pre_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
+#else
+void kvm_arch_pre_hardware_unsetup(void);
 int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void);
 void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void);
 #endif
 
 int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque);
-void kvm_arch_pre_hardware_unsetup(void);
 void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void);
 int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(void);
 int kvm_arch_check_processor_compat_all(void);
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-08 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-08 23:25 [PATCH v4 00/26] KVM: hardware enable/disable reorganize isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 01/26] KVM: x86: Drop kvm_user_return_msr_cpu_online() isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 02/26] KVM: x86: Use this_cpu_ptr() instead of per_cpu_ptr(smp_processor_id()) isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 03/26] KVM: x86: Move check_processor_compatibility from init ops to runtime ops isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 04/26] Partially revert "KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs" isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 05/26] KVM: Provide more information in kernel log if hardware enabling fails isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 06/26] KVM: arm64: Simplify the CPUHP logic isaku.yamahata
2022-09-12 15:07   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 07/26] KVM: Rename and move CPUHP_AP_KVM_STARTING to ONLINE section isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 08/26] KVM: Do compatibility checks on hotplugged CPUs isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 09/26] KVM: Do processor compatibility check on resume isaku.yamahata
2022-09-09  2:15   ` Chao Gao
2022-09-10 17:59     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 10/26] KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock isaku.yamahata
2022-09-09  3:05   ` Chao Gao
2022-09-10 18:11     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 11/26] KVM: Add arch hooks for PM events with empty stub isaku.yamahata
2022-09-09  4:34   ` Chao Gao
2022-09-11  2:39     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 12/26] KVM: x86: Move TSC fixup logic to KVM arch resume callback isaku.yamahata
2022-09-09  5:48   ` Chao Gao
2022-09-11  2:45     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 13/26] KVM: Add arch hook when VM is added/deleted isaku.yamahata
2022-09-09  6:08   ` Chao Gao
2022-09-11  2:50     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 14/26] KVM: Move out KVM arch PM hooks and hardware enable/disable logic isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 15/26] KVM: kvm_arch.c: Remove _nolock post fix isaku.yamahata
2022-09-09  6:30   ` Chao Gao
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 16/26] KVM: kvm_arch.c: Remove a global variable, hardware_enable_failed isaku.yamahata
2022-09-09  6:54   ` Chao Gao
2022-09-11  3:00     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 17/26] KVM: Introduce a arch wrapper to check all processor compatibility isaku.yamahata
2022-09-09  7:32   ` Chao Gao
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 18/26] KVM: x86: Duplicate arch callbacks related to pm events and compat check isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 19/26] KVM: Eliminate kvm_arch_post_init_vm() isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 20/26] KVM: Add config to not compile kvm_arch.c isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` isaku.yamahata [this message]
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 22/26] KVM: x86: Make x86 processor compat check callback empty isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 23/26] RFC: KVM: powerpc: Move processor compatibility check to hardware setup isaku.yamahata
2022-09-09  5:55   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-09-10  1:39     ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 24/26] KVM: Eliminate kvm_arch_check_processor_compat() isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 25/26] RFC: KVM: x86: Remove cpus_hardware_enabled and related sanity check isaku.yamahata
2022-09-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 26/26] RFC: KVM: " isaku.yamahata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c7b28e898623e22f9732c038d93366ecc70e2d33.1662679124.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --to=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuqi115@huawei.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yuan.yao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).