linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Bara <bbara93@gmail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	support.opensource@diasemi.com,
	DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@dm.renesas.com,
	Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Bara <benjamin.bara@skidata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 02/13] regulator: add getter for active monitors
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 17:37:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7ba005c-27ca-4787-a3ba-eda0fb91b584@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a71b08e-0c0d-a378-7a3a-0cd12912d4d4@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 770 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 04:43:49PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 6/20/23 23:02, Benjamin Bara wrote:

> > + * @get_active_protections: Get all enabled monitors of a regulator. OR'ed val
> > + *	of REGULATOR_MONITOR_*.

> I think it wouldn't hurt to have doc stating in which case populating this
> call-back is needed? I haven't read rest of the patches yet but I guess this
> callback is going to be used internally by the regulator core and maybe it
> is not obvious for driver author that this is needed by core to be able to
> support automatic protection handling.

I think this is true for pretty much all callbacks - broadly it's just
the case that if the hardware has a feature the best practice is that
the driver should implement all relevant operations.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-26 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-20 20:02 [PATCH RFC v4 00/13] regulator: dynamic voltage monitoring support Benjamin Bara
2023-06-20 20:02 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/13] regulator: da9063: fix null pointer deref with partial DT config Benjamin Bara
2023-06-20 20:02 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/13] regulator: add getter for active monitors Benjamin Bara
2023-06-26 13:43   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-06-26 16:37     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2023-06-20 20:02 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/13] regulator: da9063: implement get_active_protections() Benjamin Bara
2023-06-20 20:02 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/13] regulator: bd718x7: " Benjamin Bara
2023-06-26 13:45   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-06-20 20:02 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/13] regulator: introduce properties for monitoring workarounds Benjamin Bara
2023-06-26 13:47   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-06-20 20:02 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/13] regulator: set required ops " Benjamin Bara
2023-06-26 13:49   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-06-20 20:03 ` [PATCH RFC v4 07/13] regulator: find active protections during initialization Benjamin Bara
2023-06-26 13:56   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-06-26 16:49     ` Mark Brown
2023-07-03 18:43       ` Benjamin Bara
2023-07-04 13:49         ` Mark Brown
2023-06-20 20:03 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/13] regulator: move monitor handling into own function Benjamin Bara
2023-06-26 14:04   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-06-20 20:03 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/13] regulator: implement mon_disable_reg_disabled Benjamin Bara
2023-07-03 10:31   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-07-03 18:50     ` Benjamin Bara
2023-06-20 20:03 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/13] regulator: implement mon_disable_reg_set_{higher,lower} Benjamin Bara
2023-07-03 10:45   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-06-20 20:03 ` [PATCH RFC v4 11/13] regulator: implement mon_unsupported_reg_modes Benjamin Bara
2023-07-03 10:49   ` Matti Vaittinen
2023-06-20 20:03 ` [PATCH RFC v4 12/13] regulator: da9063: let the core handle the monitors Benjamin Bara
2023-06-20 20:03 ` [PATCH RFC v4 13/13] regulator: bd718x7: " Benjamin Bara
2023-07-03 11:02   ` Matti Vaittinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c7ba005c-27ca-4787-a3ba-eda0fb91b584@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@dm.renesas.com \
    --cc=bbara93@gmail.com \
    --cc=benjamin.bara@skidata.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group \
    --cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
    --cc=support.opensource@diasemi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).