From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE for s390 (KVM/s390)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:S390" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Enable specification exception interpretation
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:16:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7d61761-3426-6e44-99a8-7aa9e1cad5b6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45690e80-5c7c-1e11-99d5-c0d1482755ad@de.ibm.com>
On 06.07.21 14:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 06.07.21 13:59, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 06.07.21 13:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06.07.21 13:52, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 06 2021, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When this feature is enabled the hardware is free to interpret
>>>>> specification exceptions generated by the guest, instead of causing
>>>>> program interruption interceptions.
>>>>>
>>>>> This benefits (test) programs that generate a lot of specification
>>>>> exceptions (roughly 4x increase in exceptions/sec).
>>>>>
>>>>> Interceptions will occur as before if ICTL_PINT is set,
>>>>> i.e. if guest debug is enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> I'll additionally send kvm-unit-tests for testing this feature.
>>>>>
>>>>> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>>>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++
>>>>> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 2 ++
>>>>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> (...)
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>>>> index b655a7d82bf0..aadd589a3755 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>>>> @@ -3200,6 +3200,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>>> vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb |= ECB_SRSI;
>>>>> if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 73))
>>>>> vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb |= ECB_TE;
>>>>> + if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm))
>>>>> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb |= ECB_SPECI;
>>>>
>>>> Does this exist for any hardware version (i.e. not guarded by a cpu
>>>> feature?)
>>>
>>> Not for all hardware versions, but also no indication. The architecture
>>> says that the HW is free to do this or not. (which makes the vsie code
>>> simpler).
>>
>> I remember the architecture said at some point to never set undefined bits - and this bit is undefined on older HW generations. I might be wrong, though.
>
> I can confirm that this bit will be ignored on older machines. The notion of
> never setting undefined bits comes from "you never know what this bit will
> change in future machines". Now we know :-)
Well, okay then :)
So the plan for vSIE is to always keep it disabled? IIUC, one could
similarly always forward the bit of set.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-06 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-06 11:47 [PATCH] KVM: s390: Enable specification exception interpretation Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-07-06 11:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-06 11:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-07-06 11:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-06 12:02 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-07-06 15:16 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-07-06 15:27 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-07-07 7:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-06 11:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-07-07 8:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-07-07 8:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-07 9:55 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-07-07 11:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-07 8:56 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2021-07-07 8:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7d61761-3426-6e44-99a8-7aa9e1cad5b6@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).