From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ED9C56201 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DE5206D4 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 10:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732048AbgKXKbL (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 05:31:11 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:8577 "EHLO szxga05-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731908AbgKXKbJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 05:31:09 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CgKzj4d65zLsSS; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:30:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.74.191.121] (10.74.191.121) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:30:57 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] lockdep: Introduce in_softirq lockdep assert To: Peter Zijlstra , Jakub Kicinski CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Thomas Gleixner References: <1605927976-232804-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <1605927976-232804-2-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20201123142725.GQ3021@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20201123121259.312dcb82@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20201124081112.GF2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Yunsheng Lin Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:30:56 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201124081112.GF2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.74.191.121] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/11/24 16:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:12:59PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> One liner would be: >> >> * Acceptable for protecting per-CPU resources accessed from BH >> >> We can add: >> >> * Much like in_softirq() - semantics are ambiguous, use carefully. * >> >> >> IIUC we basically want to protect the nc array and counter here: > > Works for me, thanks! Will add the above comment in v3. Thanks. > . >