From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4325C352A1 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 19:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229607AbiK0THP (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Nov 2022 14:07:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46170 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229436AbiK0THL (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Nov 2022 14:07:11 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C01555F96 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 11:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id r12so14387491lfp.1 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 11:07:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nu5ySqON0rKMTNPTMckDOx8RTb0i6RB2rj6jQlZbbl8=; b=BjEIwtO7TaFqjipp0K9U40VdBtWTI8vZNmptvif3XQUHoSqTZwP71CwW1asiDGVGGr 6495u0di2UTD+xo4exFA5uT4vkLzcDZARFz4CquriYD3J0GRx4EWRJZNX72pDPQjUSQu Iodsr9WQy5MJ2g7qBX6sjeI+Qd5eA7reYh0jsqi247g9k5fQKTmeTfQJeODF7I3A9OBp 3WbK5/BZ6Zjb6uKzjrxgEuQsuzeoCqurvXi5JYnWOZTaWBiqXxm/rnxTH8TgRP5xSNS8 9xHk9EGobtqKTGax6I4aqSm1ZOuitEWcjLjvnYjYQs+5aXgGSFgvFIJ4FDxRVXqRRqsE ywDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nu5ySqON0rKMTNPTMckDOx8RTb0i6RB2rj6jQlZbbl8=; b=s4+tlk4LHVBo9phoF2FCOwVXWPq0a6SID7eV8JT6XnHmS7MHbhymswkbrIFopNR2jG /wuSNbEKfsRYN6ak3257d2i5btbBum4sK3rbNcid1rJJhHJju8zv7avYRwZcUpEzSWhC +m4ZiFDBcwqt+fvtXABCb3T+LdhnTt3oNAaaacA0BDjlhWNaPENgFdW8bt2kYaG7Os/4 1gzsAinjZSCFOZ+YFJQEfmr8DwR3W7siukkfb6jYl8FrOF0qJURRGW8/q8nRKwErHUi8 BCT1q+vkz4oVddMw0Hx5HFpvEzbrkd5EOCwfSDMpoLmRs0mZ6kNzLd7eHSYvIg3KyXor WayQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pm9CJiMco1tQ9N4ncQ4uRIaYEXg1J+pXO+6e9zbYA8J+3rLjWz4 x14oG2woj2wfHNLxOSCRnkGx8g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6SFeRDdtfOQYAkuUnBJwpsyfH8mtxMG79UhEUc30L5Bvf42MbEWmn458FxgVTXO+zVfv9W3Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2203:b0:4aa:83e6:53e8 with SMTP id h3-20020a056512220300b004aa83e653e8mr7068272lfu.606.1669576029105; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 11:07:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (088156142067.dynamic-2-waw-k-3-2-0.vectranet.pl. [88.156.142.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p12-20020ac24ecc000000b0049a5a59aa68sm1390312lfr.10.2022.11.27.11.07.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 27 Nov 2022 11:07:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 20:07:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: amlogic: align LED node names with dtschema Content-Language: en-US To: Neil Armstrong Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Kevin Hilman , Jerome Brunet , Martin Blumenstingl , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20221125144141.477253-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <3719828c-0ac5-34c9-a04b-251cbeb5f6ef@linaro.org> <54f500cb-d7d0-8af1-eb58-99fbe71791a5@linaro.org> <615eb86b-a00a-56bc-ae1a-9f0e4e86f77c@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/11/2022 14:33, Neil Armstrong wrote: > > Le 27/11/2022 à 13:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit : >> On 26/11/2022 17:03, Neil Armstrong wrote: >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong >>>>> Aren't you maintainer of the platform? This means I should take care of >>>>> this patch? >>>> Ah, this will be picked up by Kevin or Jerome? So this tag means only >>>> Reviewer's statement of oversight, right? >>> Of course I'll pick it. >>> >> So that's confusing to see Review which does not mean review, but >> maintainer pick... > > Reviewed-by means reviewed, there's no confusion here, the significance > is clearly documented on https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html > >> >> Reviewed-by means, I should take your tag and add to v2 or the >> maintainer will add it when picking up. > > Reviewed-by means reviewed, fully reviewed patches are ready to > be picked unless a change is asked by a reviewer. > > Decision to pick or not a patch does not depend on any tags, but > is the sole decision of the maintainer adding it's Signed-off-by. Then why giving review tag and not notifying about the pick, while the pick actually happens? This is confusing. When the maintainer, which is supposed to pick patch, gives reviewed it means always the same as acked, so the patch is expected to go other way. Not through that maintainer's tree. If you just apply it, say you apply it. Best regards, Krzysztof