From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"zhongjiang@huawei.com" <zhongjiang@huawei.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"fthain@telegraphics.com.au" <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>,
"schmitzmic@gmail.com" <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
Cc: "andy.shevchenko@gmail.com" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"john.garry@huawei.com" <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi:NCR5380: remove same check condition in NCR5380_select
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 03:26:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c99a75a2905c1eef50f94ccc0871c36af431e21a.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533179408-20631-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com>
On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 11:10 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> The same check condition is redundant, so remove one of them.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
> index 90ea0f5..2ecaf3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c
> @@ -999,8 +999,7 @@ static struct scsi_cmnd *NCR5380_select(struct Scsi_Host *instance,
>
> /* Check for lost arbitration */
> if ((NCR5380_read(INITIATOR_COMMAND_REG) & ICR_ARBITRATION_LOST) ||
> - (NCR5380_read(CURRENT_SCSI_DATA_REG) & hostdata->id_higher_mask) ||
> - (NCR5380_read(INITIATOR_COMMAND_REG) & ICR_ARBITRATION_LOST)) {
> + (NCR5380_read(CURRENT_SCSI_DATA_REG) & hostdata->id_higher_mask)) {
> NCR5380_write(MODE_REG, MR_BASE);
> dsprintk(NDEBUG_ARBITRATION, instance, "lost arbitration, deasserting MR_ARBITRATE\n");
> spin_lock_irq(&hostdata->lock);
Has this patch been tested?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-02 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-02 3:10 [PATCH] scsi:NCR5380: remove same check condition in NCR5380_select zhong jiang
2018-08-02 3:26 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-08-02 3:45 ` zhong jiang
2018-08-02 7:32 ` Michael Schmitz
2018-08-03 2:56 ` Finn Thain
2018-08-03 4:19 ` Michael Schmitz
2018-08-03 6:04 ` Finn Thain
2018-08-03 2:24 ` Finn Thain
2018-08-03 9:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-08-03 9:52 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c99a75a2905c1eef50f94ccc0871c36af431e21a.camel@wdc.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).