From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
yao.jin@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix invalid unit check
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:54:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb0d2d43-102a-994c-f777-e11d61c77bf5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNw7CT2sBE0l8aNf@kroah.com>
On 6/30/2021 5:36 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:14:02AM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> The uncore unit with the type ID 0 and the unit ID 0 is missed.
>>
>> The table3 of the uncore unit maybe 0. The
>> uncore_discovery_invalid_unit() mistakenly treated it as an invalid
>> value.
>>
>> Remove the !unit.table3 check.
>>
>> Fixes: edae1f06c2cd ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Parse uncore discovery tables")
>> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Why is a bugfix that needs to be backported patch 5 in the series?
> Shouldn't that be totally independant and sent on its own and not part
> of this series at all so that it can be accepted and merged much
> quicker? It also should not depened on the previous 4 patches, right?
>
Yes, you are right.
I found the bug when I tested this patch set. so I appended it at the
end of the patch set. I will split the patch and send it separately.
Thanks,
Kan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-29 18:13 [PATCH V3 0/6] perf: Add Sapphire Rapids server uncore support kan.liang
2021-06-29 18:13 ` [PATCH V3 1/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Sapphire Rapids server support kan.liang
2021-06-30 9:36 ` Greg KH
2021-06-30 12:56 ` Liang, Kan
2021-06-30 13:05 ` Greg KH
2021-06-30 9:39 ` Greg KH
2021-06-30 13:06 ` Liang, Kan
2021-06-29 18:13 ` [PATCH V3 2/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add alias PMU name kan.liang
2021-06-30 9:39 ` Greg KH
2021-06-30 13:06 ` Liang, Kan
2021-06-29 18:14 ` [PATCH V3 3/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Factor out snr_uncore_mmio_map() kan.liang
2021-06-29 18:14 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Support free-running counters on Sapphire Rapids server kan.liang
2021-06-29 18:14 ` [PATCH V3 5/6] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix invalid unit check kan.liang
2021-06-30 9:36 ` Greg KH
2021-06-30 12:54 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2021-06-29 18:14 ` [PATCH V3 6/6] perf pmu: Add PMU alias support kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb0d2d43-102a-994c-f777-e11d61c77bf5@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).