linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] s390/uaccess: Add storage key checked access to user memory
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:18:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb563fbc-3f16-2d41-ab88-5c83e7d484ec@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220118095210.1651483-2-scgl@linux.ibm.com>

On 1/18/22 10:52, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> KVM needs a mechanism to do accesses to guest memory that honor
> storage key protection.
> Since the copy_to/from_user implementation makes use of move
> instructions that support having an additional access key supplied,
> we can implement __copy_from/to_user_with_key by enhancing the
> existing implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>

For this I'd like to have buy-in from the kernel maintainers.
The patch looks good to me but currently I don't understand all of the 
background so:

Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>   arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c         | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 02b467461163..5138040348cc 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,38 @@ static inline int __range_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
>   
>   #define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok(addr, size)
>   
> +unsigned long __must_check
> +raw_copy_from_user_with_key(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n,
> +			    char key);
> +
> +unsigned long __must_check
> +raw_copy_to_user_with_key(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n,
> +			  char key);
> +
> +static __always_inline __must_check unsigned long
> +__copy_from_user_with_key(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n,
> +			  char key)
> +{
> +	might_fault();
> +	if (should_fail_usercopy())
> +		return n;
> +	instrument_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> +	check_object_size(to, n, false);
> +	return raw_copy_from_user_with_key(to, from, n, key);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline __must_check unsigned long
> +__copy_to_user_with_key(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n,
> +			char key)
> +{
> +	might_fault();
> +	if (should_fail_usercopy())
> +		return n;
> +	instrument_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> +	check_object_size(from, n, true);
> +	return raw_copy_to_user_with_key(to, from, n, key);
> +}
> +
>   unsigned long __must_check
>   raw_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
>   
> diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c b/arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c
> index d3a700385875..ce7a150dd93a 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c
> @@ -59,11 +59,13 @@ static inline int copy_with_mvcos(void)
>   #endif
>   
>   static inline unsigned long copy_from_user_mvcos(void *x, const void __user *ptr,
> -						 unsigned long size)
> +						 unsigned long size, char key)
>   {
>   	unsigned long tmp1, tmp2;
>   	union oac spec = {
> +		.oac2.key = key,
>   		.oac2.as = PSW_BITS_AS_SECONDARY,
> +		.oac2.k = 1,
>   		.oac2.a = 1,
>   	};
>   
> @@ -94,19 +96,19 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_from_user_mvcos(void *x, const void __user *ptr
>   }
>   
>   static inline unsigned long copy_from_user_mvcp(void *x, const void __user *ptr,
> -						unsigned long size)
> +						unsigned long size, char key)
>   {
>   	unsigned long tmp1, tmp2;
>   
>   	tmp1 = -256UL;
>   	asm volatile(
>   		"   sacf  0\n"
> -		"0: mvcp  0(%0,%2),0(%1),%3\n"
> +		"0: mvcp  0(%0,%2),0(%1),%[key]\n"
>   		"7: jz    5f\n"
>   		"1: algr  %0,%3\n"
>   		"   la    %1,256(%1)\n"
>   		"   la    %2,256(%2)\n"
> -		"2: mvcp  0(%0,%2),0(%1),%3\n"
> +		"2: mvcp  0(%0,%2),0(%1),%[key]\n"
>   		"8: jnz   1b\n"
>   		"   j     5f\n"
>   		"3: la    %4,255(%1)\n"	/* %4 = ptr + 255 */
> @@ -115,7 +117,7 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_from_user_mvcp(void *x, const void __user *ptr,
>   		"   slgr  %4,%1\n"
>   		"   clgr  %0,%4\n"	/* copy crosses next page boundary? */
>   		"   jnh   6f\n"
> -		"4: mvcp  0(%4,%2),0(%1),%3\n"
> +		"4: mvcp  0(%4,%2),0(%1),%[key]\n"
>   		"9: slgr  %0,%4\n"
>   		"   j     6f\n"
>   		"5: slgr  %0,%0\n"
> @@ -123,24 +125,36 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_from_user_mvcp(void *x, const void __user *ptr,
>   		EX_TABLE(0b,3b) EX_TABLE(2b,3b) EX_TABLE(4b,6b)
>   		EX_TABLE(7b,3b) EX_TABLE(8b,3b) EX_TABLE(9b,6b)
>   		: "+a" (size), "+a" (ptr), "+a" (x), "+a" (tmp1), "=a" (tmp2)
> -		: : "cc", "memory");
> +		: [key] "d" (key << 4)
> +		: "cc", "memory");
>   	return size;
>   }
>   
>   unsigned long raw_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
>   {
>   	if (copy_with_mvcos())
> -		return copy_from_user_mvcos(to, from, n);
> -	return copy_from_user_mvcp(to, from, n);
> +		return copy_from_user_mvcos(to, from, n, 0);
> +	return copy_from_user_mvcp(to, from, n, 0);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(raw_copy_from_user);
>   
> -static inline unsigned long copy_to_user_mvcos(void __user *ptr, const void *x,
> -					       unsigned long size)
> +unsigned long raw_copy_from_user_with_key(void *to, const void __user *from,
> +					  unsigned long n, char key)
> +{
> +	if (copy_with_mvcos())
> +		return copy_from_user_mvcos(to, from, n, key);
> +	return copy_from_user_mvcp(to, from, n, key);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(raw_copy_from_user_with_key);
> +
> +inline unsigned long copy_to_user_mvcos(void __user *ptr, const void *x,
> +					unsigned long size, char key)
>   {
>   	unsigned long tmp1, tmp2;
>   	union oac spec = {
> +		.oac1.key = key,
>   		.oac1.as = PSW_BITS_AS_SECONDARY,
> +		.oac1.k = 1,
>   		.oac1.a = 1,
>   	};
>   
> @@ -171,19 +185,19 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_to_user_mvcos(void __user *ptr, const void *x,
>   }
>   
>   static inline unsigned long copy_to_user_mvcs(void __user *ptr, const void *x,
> -					      unsigned long size)
> +					      unsigned long size, char key)
>   {
>   	unsigned long tmp1, tmp2;
>   
>   	tmp1 = -256UL;
>   	asm volatile(
>   		"   sacf  0\n"
> -		"0: mvcs  0(%0,%1),0(%2),%3\n"
> +		"0: mvcs  0(%0,%1),0(%2),%[key]\n"
>   		"7: jz    5f\n"
>   		"1: algr  %0,%3\n"
>   		"   la    %1,256(%1)\n"
>   		"   la    %2,256(%2)\n"
> -		"2: mvcs  0(%0,%1),0(%2),%3\n"
> +		"2: mvcs  0(%0,%1),0(%2),%[key]\n"
>   		"8: jnz   1b\n"
>   		"   j     5f\n"
>   		"3: la    %4,255(%1)\n" /* %4 = ptr + 255 */
> @@ -192,7 +206,7 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_to_user_mvcs(void __user *ptr, const void *x,
>   		"   slgr  %4,%1\n"
>   		"   clgr  %0,%4\n"	/* copy crosses next page boundary? */
>   		"   jnh   6f\n"
> -		"4: mvcs  0(%4,%1),0(%2),%3\n"
> +		"4: mvcs  0(%4,%1),0(%2),%[key]\n"
>   		"9: slgr  %0,%4\n"
>   		"   j     6f\n"
>   		"5: slgr  %0,%0\n"
> @@ -200,17 +214,26 @@ static inline unsigned long copy_to_user_mvcs(void __user *ptr, const void *x,
>   		EX_TABLE(0b,3b) EX_TABLE(2b,3b) EX_TABLE(4b,6b)
>   		EX_TABLE(7b,3b) EX_TABLE(8b,3b) EX_TABLE(9b,6b)
>   		: "+a" (size), "+a" (ptr), "+a" (x), "+a" (tmp1), "=a" (tmp2)
> -		: : "cc", "memory");
> +		: [key] "d" (key << 4)
> +		: "cc", "memory");
>   	return size;
>   }
>   
>   unsigned long raw_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>   {
>   	if (copy_with_mvcos())
> -		return copy_to_user_mvcos(to, from, n);
> -	return copy_to_user_mvcs(to, from, n);
> +		return copy_to_user_mvcos(to, from, n, 0);
> +	return copy_to_user_mvcs(to, from, n, 0);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(raw_copy_to_user);
> +unsigned long raw_copy_to_user_with_key(void __user *to, const void *from,
> +					unsigned long n, char key)
> +{
> +	if (copy_with_mvcos())
> +		return copy_to_user_mvcos(to, from, n, key);
> +	return copy_to_user_mvcs(to, from, n, key);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(raw_copy_to_user_with_key);
>   
>   static inline unsigned long clear_user_mvcos(void __user *to, unsigned long size)
>   {
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-18 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-18  9:52 [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] KVM: s390: Do storage key checking Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] s390/uaccess: Add storage key checked access to user memory Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18 13:18   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2022-01-18 15:37   ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-18 15:52     ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-19  9:48   ` Heiko Carstens
2022-01-19 11:02     ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-19 13:20       ` Heiko Carstens
2022-01-20  8:34         ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-20 12:56           ` Heiko Carstens
2022-01-20 18:19             ` Heiko Carstens
2022-01-21  7:32               ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-01-21 11:04                 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-01-21 13:46                   ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-21 14:26                     ` Heiko Carstens
2022-01-24 10:38                       ` [RFC PATCH] uaccess: Add mechanism for " Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-24 17:41                         ` Heiko Carstens
2022-01-25 12:35                           ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-25 13:23                             ` Heiko Carstens
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/10] KVM: s390: Honor storage keys when accessing guest memory Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18 14:38   ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-20 10:27     ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-01-20 10:30       ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-19 19:27   ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-01-20  8:11     ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-20  8:50       ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-01-20  8:58         ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-20  9:06           ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/10] KVM: s390: handle_tprot: Honor storage keys Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/10] KVM: s390: selftests: Test TEST PROTECTION emulation Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-20 15:40   ` Janosch Frank
2022-01-21 11:03     ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-21 12:28       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-21 13:50         ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/10] KVM: s390: Add optional storage key checking to MEMOP IOCTL Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18 11:51   ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/10] KVM: s390: Add vm IOCTL for key checked guest absolute memory access Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-19 11:52   ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-19 12:46     ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-01-19 12:53       ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-19 13:17         ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-20 10:38   ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-20 11:20     ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-01-20 12:23     ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-25 12:00       ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-27 16:29         ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-27 17:34           ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/10] KVM: s390: Rename existing vcpu memop functions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/10] KVM: s390: selftests: Test memops with storage keys Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/10] KVM: s390: Add capability for storage key extension of MEM_OP IOCTL Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-01-18 15:12   ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-01-18  9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/10] KVM: s390: selftests: Make use of capability in MEM_OP test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb563fbc-3f16-2d41-ab88-5c83e7d484ec@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).