linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Al Grant <al.grant@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>, Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] perf arm-spe: Set thread TID
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:40:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb7c6deb-e4a1-95fa-b0d2-e4405f644e63@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210131120156.GB230721@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>



On 31/01/2021 14:01, Leo Yan wrote:
> Option 1: by merging patches 07/08 and 08/08, we can firstly support PID
> tracing for root namespace, and later we can extend to support PID
> tracing in container (and in VMs).
> 
> Option 2: we can use the software method to establish PID for SPE
> trace, which can base on kernel's events PERF_RECORD_SWITCH /
> PERF_RECORD_SWITCH_CPU_WIDE and check context switch ip.
> 
> To be honest, I am a bit concern for option 1 for later might
> introduce regression when later support PID for containers (and VMs).
> If you have a plan for option 1, I think it's good to record current
> limitation and the plan for next step in the commit log, so we can merge
> this patch at this time and later extend for containers.
> 
> Otherwise, we need to consider how to implement the PID tracing with
> option 2.  If it is the case, we should firstly only merge patches
> 01 ~ 06 for data source enabling.  How about you think for this?

In my opinion we should do option 1 and use what is there at the moment. That
gets users 90% of the functionality right now.

I plan to look at option 2 at some point, and it can always be added on top of
option 1 or replace what is there. But I don't know when I would get to it or
how long it will take.

James

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> 
> Besides for techinical question, you could add your "Co-developed-by"
> tags for patches 06, 07, 08/08, which you have took time to refin them.
> 
> Thanks you for kindly efforts.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1353286/
> 
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Al Grant <al.grant@arm.com>
>> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
>> index 27a0b9dfe22d..9828fad7e516 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
>> @@ -223,6 +223,46 @@ static inline u8 arm_spe_cpumode(struct arm_spe *spe, u64 ip)
>>  		PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void arm_spe_set_pid_tid_cpu(struct arm_spe *spe,
>> +				    struct auxtrace_queue *queue)
>> +{
>> +	struct arm_spe_queue *speq = queue->priv;
>> +	pid_t tid;
>> +
>> +	tid = machine__get_current_tid(spe->machine, speq->cpu);
>> +	if (tid != -1) {
>> +		speq->tid = tid;
>> +		thread__zput(speq->thread);
>> +	} else
>> +		speq->tid = queue->tid;
>> +
>> +	if ((!speq->thread) && (speq->tid != -1)) {
>> +		speq->thread = machine__find_thread(spe->machine, -1,
>> +						    speq->tid);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (speq->thread) {
>> +		speq->pid = speq->thread->pid_;
>> +		if (queue->cpu == -1)
>> +			speq->cpu = speq->thread->cpu;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int arm_spe_set_tid(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, pid_t tid)
>> +{
>> +	int err;
>> +	struct arm_spe *spe = speq->spe;
>> +	struct auxtrace_queue *queue;
>> +
>> +	err = machine__set_current_tid(spe->machine, speq->cpu, tid, tid);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		return err;
>> +
>> +	queue = &speq->spe->queues.queue_array[speq->queue_nr];
>> +	arm_spe_set_pid_tid_cpu(speq->spe, queue);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void arm_spe_prep_sample(struct arm_spe *spe,
>>  				struct arm_spe_queue *speq,
>>  				union perf_event *event,
>> @@ -431,6 +471,7 @@ static int arm_spe_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq)
>>  static int arm_spe_run_decoder(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, u64 *timestamp)
>>  {
>>  	struct arm_spe *spe = speq->spe;
>> +	const struct arm_spe_record *record;
>>  	int ret;
>>  
>>  	if (!spe->kernel_start)
>> @@ -450,6 +491,11 @@ static int arm_spe_run_decoder(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, u64 *timestamp)
>>  		if (ret < 0)
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> +		record = &speq->decoder->record;
>> +		ret = arm_spe_set_tid(speq, record->context_id);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +
>>  		ret = arm_spe_sample(speq);
>>  		if (ret)
>>  			return ret;
>> @@ -500,6 +546,10 @@ static int arm_spe__setup_queue(struct arm_spe *spe,
>>  
>>  		record = &speq->decoder->record;
>>  
>> +		ret = arm_spe_set_tid(speq, record->context_id);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +
>>  		speq->timestamp = record->timestamp;
>>  		ret = auxtrace_heap__add(&spe->heap, queue_nr, speq->timestamp);
>>  		if (ret)
>> @@ -552,31 +602,6 @@ static bool arm_spe__is_timeless_decoding(struct arm_spe *spe)
>>  	return timeless_decoding;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void arm_spe_set_pid_tid_cpu(struct arm_spe *spe,
>> -				    struct auxtrace_queue *queue)
>> -{
>> -	struct arm_spe_queue *speq = queue->priv;
>> -	pid_t tid;
>> -
>> -	tid = machine__get_current_tid(spe->machine, speq->cpu);
>> -	if (tid != -1) {
>> -		speq->tid = tid;
>> -		thread__zput(speq->thread);
>> -	} else
>> -		speq->tid = queue->tid;
>> -
>> -	if ((!speq->thread) && (speq->tid != -1)) {
>> -		speq->thread = machine__find_thread(spe->machine, -1,
>> -						    speq->tid);
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (speq->thread) {
>> -		speq->pid = speq->thread->pid_;
>> -		if (queue->cpu == -1)
>> -			speq->cpu = speq->thread->cpu;
>> -	}
>> -}
>> -
>>  static int arm_spe_process_queues(struct arm_spe *spe, u64 timestamp)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned int queue_nr;
>> -- 
>> 2.28.0
>>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 14:46 [PATCH 1/8] perf arm-spe: Enable sample type PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC James Clark
2021-01-19 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf arm-spe: Store memory address in packet James Clark
2021-01-19 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf arm-spe: Store operation type " James Clark
2021-01-19 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf arm-spe: Fill address info for samples James Clark
2021-01-19 14:46 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf arm-spe: Synthesize memory event James Clark
2021-01-19 14:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf arm-spe: Set sample's data source field James Clark
2021-01-19 14:46 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf arm-spe: Save context ID in record James Clark
2021-01-19 14:46 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf arm-spe: Set thread TID James Clark
     [not found]   ` <20210131120156.GB230721@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
2021-02-01 17:40     ` James Clark [this message]
2021-02-04 10:27       ` Leo Yan
2021-02-09 15:36         ` James Clark
2021-02-10 10:16           ` James Clark
2021-02-10 12:03             ` Leo Yan
2021-01-22 12:51 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf arm-spe: Enable sample type PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-01-22 14:30   ` Leo Yan
2021-02-11 13:41   ` James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb7c6deb-e4a1-95fa-b0d2-e4405f644e63@arm.com \
    --to=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=al.grant@arm.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tanxiaojun@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).