From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F26C4332D for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CF523121 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2393174AbhASMkF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 07:40:05 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:38753 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389491AbhASM3D (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 07:29:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611059222; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UWWEX+tZcqi8Aed2AQBNeafP+kkMB/om7kZIB/JclL8=; b=Zee/6/PWKZqU4R199+2WN+UVWHnDRlGg8mbbGPEYimqd8q6Uknhcbg0oz2iHeekHitTKOy fSEGiTLwKNt6qvzDTt54V5gCmEwkUQon2mUJ1HRbnIKzht2rrq4/rJPw23vxA1SbTJ49fT i2sNGXqb+UGgXslrfd3KJMYZOLZym38= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-550-Ma0I1oXsPsWpn3E27LhNdg-1; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 07:26:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Ma0I1oXsPsWpn3E27LhNdg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C8459; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.114.143] (ovpn-114-143.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.143]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8412F5C8A7; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] s390/mm: Define arch_get_mappable_range() To: Anshuman Khandual , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: Oscar Salvador , Vasily Gorbik , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1610975582-12646-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <1610975582-12646-4-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:26:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1610975582-12646-4-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18.01.21 14:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This overrides arch_get_mappabble_range() on s390 platform which will be > used with recently added generic framework. It modifies the existing range > check in vmem_add_mapping() using arch_get_mappable_range(). It also adds a > VM_BUG_ON() check that would ensure that memhp_range_allowed() has already > been called on the hotplug path. > > Cc: Heiko Carstens > Cc: Vasily Gorbik > Cc: David Hildenbrand > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual > --- > arch/s390/mm/init.c | 1 + > arch/s390/mm/vmem.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c > index 73a163065b95..97017a4bcc90 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c > @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(params->pgprot.pgprot != PAGE_KERNEL.pgprot)) > return -EINVAL; > > + VM_BUG_ON(!memhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); > rc = vmem_add_mapping(start, size); > if (rc) > return rc; > diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c b/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c > index 01f3a5f58e64..afc39ff1cc8d 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c > +++ b/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > * Author(s): Heiko Carstens > */ > > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -532,11 +533,23 @@ void vmem_remove_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > mutex_unlock(&vmem_mutex); > } > > +struct range arch_get_mappable_range(void) > +{ > + struct range memhp_range; You could do: memhp_range = { .start = 0, .end = VMEM_MAX_PHYS - 1, }; Similar in the arm64 patch. > + > + memhp_range.start = 0; > + memhp_range.end = VMEM_MAX_PHYS - 1; > + return memhp_range; > +} > + > int vmem_add_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > { > + struct range range; > int ret; > > - if (start + size > VMEM_MAX_PHYS || > + range = arch_get_mappable_range(); You could do struct range range = arch_get_mappable_range(); > + if (start < range.start || > + start + size > range.end + 1 || > start + size < start) > return -ERANGE; > > -- Thanks, David / dhildenb