From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/tdx: Add tdx_mcall_tdreport() API support
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 20:53:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd3f1a74-e44d-06bd-7cad-90d98213eb39@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <283f3d9ec19597856521e66895348e80ef51f10a.camel@intel.com>
On 4/18/22 8:51 PM, Kai Huang wrote:
>> Users are responsible to allocate aligned data. I don't think we need
>> to add a check for it. If it is unaligned, TDCALL will return error.
> Actually this is the kernel memory, but not user memory. Otherwise
> virt_to_phys() doesn't make sense. You copied the user data to kernel memory in
> the last patch. So whether user memory is aligned doesn't matter, and in last
> patch, you have guaranteed the alignment is met during kernel memory allocation.
I mean't user of this API (not user space). But I agree with your
comments.
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-19 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-15 22:01 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add TDX Guest Attestation support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-04-15 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/tdx: Add tdx_mcall_tdreport() API support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-04-19 2:29 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-19 3:37 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-19 3:51 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-19 3:53 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy [this message]
2022-04-15 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86/tdx: Add tdx_hcall_get_quote() " Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-04-19 2:59 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-19 4:04 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-19 4:40 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-19 5:28 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-19 7:21 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-20 3:39 ` Aubrey Li
2022-04-20 7:16 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-20 8:08 ` Aubrey Li
2022-04-22 17:24 ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-04-25 3:06 ` Aubrey Li
2022-04-15 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/tdx: Add TDX Guest event notify interrupt support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-04-15 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] platform/x86: intel_tdx_attest: Add TDX Guest attestation interface driver Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2022-04-19 7:47 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-19 8:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-19 12:48 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-20 22:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-20 22:09 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-21 9:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-04-21 14:54 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-19 8:16 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-19 14:00 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-19 22:38 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-19 14:13 ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-19 14:19 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-19 14:24 ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-19 14:26 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-19 22:21 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-19 22:49 ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-19 23:02 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-20 1:20 ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-04-20 1:26 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-21 7:04 ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-04-21 14:44 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-20 23:18 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-20 23:45 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-21 0:11 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-21 2:42 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-21 6:57 ` Isaku Yamahata
2022-04-21 10:33 ` Kai Huang
2022-04-21 14:53 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2022-04-21 16:53 ` Isaku Yamahata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd3f1a74-e44d-06bd-7cad-90d98213eb39@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).